↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  107 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  41   ~;  41   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (   6 sgn  57   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l37_co,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3,X4] :
          ( ( less_than(X4,X3)
            & pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
         => pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X3) )
     => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
          ( ( less_than(X7,X6)
            & pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X5,X6) )
         => pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X7),X5,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l37_co) ).

fof(ax29,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X4,X3)
     => update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X3),pair(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax29) ).

fof(ax30,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( less_than(X3,X4)
     => update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X3),pair(X2,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax30) ).

fof(ax23,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3,X5)
    <=> ( ( X4 = X5
          & X2 = X3 )
        | pair_in_list(X1,X3,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax23) ).

fof(stricly_smaller_definition,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',stricly_smaller_definition) ).

fof(totality,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less_than(X2,X1)
      | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',totality) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ! [X2,X3,X4] :
            ( ( less_than(X4,X3)
              & pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
           => pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X3) )
       => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
            ( ( less_than(X7,X6)
              & pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X5,X6) )
           => pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X7),X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l37_co]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X58,X59,X60] :
      ( ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0)
      & less_than(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      & pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0)
      & ( pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X60),X58,X59)
        | ~ less_than(X60,X59)
        | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X58,X59) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X49,X50,X51,X52] :
      ( update_slb(insert_slb(X49,pair(X50,X52)),X51) = insert_slb(update_slb(X49,X51),pair(X50,X51))
      | ~ strictly_less_than(X52,X51) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax29])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X53,X54,X55,X56] :
      ( update_slb(insert_slb(X53,pair(X54,X56)),X55) = insert_slb(update_slb(X53,X55),pair(X54,X56))
      | ~ less_than(X55,X56) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax30])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X1)),X2) = insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X2),pair(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X29,pair(X30,X32)),X31,X33)
        | X32 != X33
        | X30 != X31 )
      & ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X29,pair(X30,X32)),X31,X33)
        | ~ pair_in_list(X29,X31,X33) )
      & ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X29,pair(X30,X32)),X31,X33)
        | pair_in_list(X29,X31,X33)
        | X32 = X33 )
      & ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X29,pair(X30,X32)),X31,X33)
        | pair_in_list(X29,X31,X33)
        | X30 = X31 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax23])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[stricly_smaller_definition]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X2)),X1) = insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X1),pair(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk4_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3)
    | pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X4,X5)),X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( strictly_less_than(X16,X17)
        | less_than(X17,X16)
        | ~ less_than(X16,X17) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X16,X17)
        | ~ less_than(X17,X16) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X16,X17)
        | less_than(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( less_than(X14,X13)
      | less_than(X13,X14) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[totality]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X1,X2)
    | pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X3),X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    less_than(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2)
    | pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4)
    | pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | esk6_0 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | esk2_0 = esk5_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( X3 != X4
    | X1 != X2
    | pair_in_list(insert_slb(X5,pair(X1,X3)),X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2,X3),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_36]),c_0_36]),c_0_22])]),c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:44:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3064152 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3064159 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 90
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 81
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 81
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 67
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 75
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 44
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 33
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 0.14/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 90
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 42
% 0.14/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188
% 0.14/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 170
% 0.14/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.14/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.14/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2865
% 0.14/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 356
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------