↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV403+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  114 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  42   ~;  45   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (   6 sgn  57   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l39_co,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3,X4] :
          ( ( strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
            & pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
         => pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) )
     => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
          ( ( strictly_less_than(X6,X7)
            & pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X5,X6) )
         => pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X7),X5,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_co) ).

fof(ax29,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X4,X3)
     => update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X3),pair(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax29) ).

fof(ax23,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3,X5)
    <=> ( ( X4 = X5
          & X2 = X3 )
        | pair_in_list(X1,X3,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax23) ).

fof(ax30,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( less_than(X3,X4)
     => update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X4)),X3) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X3),pair(X2,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax30) ).

fof(stricly_smaller_definition,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',stricly_smaller_definition) ).

fof(totality,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less_than(X2,X1)
      | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',totality) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ! [X2,X3,X4] :
            ( ( strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
              & pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
           => pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) )
       => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
            ( ( strictly_less_than(X6,X7)
              & pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X5,X6) )
           => pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X8,X9)),X7),X5,X7) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l39_co]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0)
      & strictly_less_than(esk3_0,esk4_0)
      & pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0)
      & ( pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X13),X11,X13)
        | ~ strictly_less_than(X12,X13)
        | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( update_slb(insert_slb(X27,pair(X28,X30)),X29) = insert_slb(update_slb(X27,X29),pair(X28,X29))
      | ~ strictly_less_than(X30,X29) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax29])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X21,pair(X22,X24)),X23,X25)
        | X24 != X25
        | X22 != X23 )
      & ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X21,pair(X22,X24)),X23,X25)
        | ~ pair_in_list(X21,X23,X25) )
      & ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X21,pair(X22,X24)),X23,X25)
        | pair_in_list(X21,X23,X25)
        | X24 = X25 )
      & ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X21,pair(X22,X24)),X23,X25)
        | pair_in_list(X21,X23,X25)
        | X22 = X23 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax23])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( update_slb(insert_slb(X31,pair(X32,X34)),X33) = insert_slb(update_slb(X31,X33),pair(X32,X34))
      | ~ less_than(X33,X34) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax30])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X1)),X2) = insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X2),pair(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2)
    | pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[stricly_smaller_definition]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X2)),X1) = insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X1),pair(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk4_0)),esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3)
    | pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X4,X5)),X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(X2,X3)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X1,X2)
    | pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X3),X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | esk6_0 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ( strictly_less_than(X35,X36)
        | less_than(X36,X35)
        | ~ less_than(X35,X36) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X35,X36)
        | ~ less_than(X36,X35) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X35,X36)
        | less_than(X35,X36) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( less_than(X42,X41)
      | less_than(X41,X42) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[totality]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk3_0,X1)
    | pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X1),esk2_0,X1)
    | esk6_0 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    strictly_less_than(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | esk6_0 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    | esk6_0 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4)
    | pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | esk2_0 = esk5_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_34]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk3_0,X1)
    | pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X1),esk2_0,X1)
    | esk2_0 = esk5_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( X3 != X4
    | X1 != X2
    | pair_in_list(insert_slb(X5,pair(X1,X3)),X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk4_0)),esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_34]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2,X3),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV403+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:49:38 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % new_bool_1 with pid 2064224 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2064230 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 22
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 0.10/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 122
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 65
% 0.10/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.10/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.10/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 249
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 193
% 0.10/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.10/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 213
% 0.10/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 34
% 0.10/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 85
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 61
% 0.10/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 39
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.10/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 28
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 92
% 0.10/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 454
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.10/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 693
% 0.10/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 503
% 0.10/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 64
% 0.10/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.10/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4041
% 0.10/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 357
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3604 pages
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------