↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWV407+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:51:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 24.14s 6.41s
% Output   : Proof 29.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV407+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 06:21:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.68/0.64          ____       _                          
% 0.68/0.64    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.68/0.64   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.68/0.64  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.68/0.64  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.68/0.65  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.68/0.65  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.68/0.65  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.68/0.65  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.68/0.65  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.84/0.71  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.85/1.05  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.37/1.41  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.37/1.44  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.45/2.40  Prover 0: gave up
% 7.45/2.40  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 7.45/2.45  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 7.91/2.58  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.46/5.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.46/5.58  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 20.87/5.66  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 20.87/5.67  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 24.14/6.41  Prover 2: proved (874ms)
% 24.14/6.41  Prover 1: stopped
% 24.14/6.41  
% 24.14/6.41  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 24.14/6.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 24.14/6.41  
% 24.14/6.41  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 28.99/7.53  found it (size 514)
% 28.99/7.53  
% 28.99/7.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 28.99/7.53  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 28.99/7.53  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & findmin_cpq_res(v4) = v5 & contains_cpq(v4, v7) = 0 & triple(v1, v2, v3) = v4 & check_cpq(v6) = 0 & findmin_cpq_eff(v4) = v6 & isnonempty_slb(create_slb) = v0 & strictly_less_than(v7, v5) = 0 &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v14, v10, v12) = v15) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & pair_in_list(v8, v10, v12) = v16)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (insert_pqp(v8, v11) = v12) |  ~ (triple(v12, v14, v10) = v15) |  ~ (pair(v11, bottom) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v9, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v16 & insert_cpq(v16, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v14, v10) = v15) |  ~ (pair(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v9, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] : (( ~ (v16 = 0) & less_than(v12, v11) = v16) | (((v18 = 0 & triple(v8, v9, v10) = v17 & check_cpq(v17) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & check_cpq(v15) = v16)) & ((v16 = 0 & check_cpq(v15) = 0) | ( ~ (v18 = 0) & triple(v8, v9, v10) = v17 & check_cpq(v17) = v18))))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v14, v10) = v15) |  ~ (pair(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v9, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : (( ~ (v16 = 0) & check_cpq(v15) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v11, v12) = v16))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (less_than(v13, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : (( ~ (v15 = 0) & check_cpq(v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & pair_in_list(v9, v12, v13) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & contains_slb(v8, v10) = v15)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v12 = v11 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v14, v10, v12) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v13) = v14) | pair_in_list(v8, v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v10 = v9 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = v14 & lookup_slb(v8, v10) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & contains_slb(v8, v10) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v10 = v9 |  ~ (remove_slb(v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v14 & remove_slb(v8, v10) = v15 & insert_slb(v15, v12) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & contains_slb(v8, v10) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v10 = v9 |  ~ (remove_slb(v8, v10) = v13) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v13, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v14 & remove_slb(v15, v10) = v14 & insert_slb(v8, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & contains_slb(v8, v10) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v10 = v9 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v14, v10, v12) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v13) = v14) | pair_in_list(v8, v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (remove_pqp(v8, v11) = v12) |  ~ (triple(v12, v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (remove_slb(v9, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v14 & triple(v8, v9, v10) = v15 & remove_cpq(v15, v11) = v14) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v11) = v15 & less_than(v15, v11) = v16) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (update_slb(v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] : ((v17 = v14 & update_slb(v8, v10) = v15 & pair(v9, v10) = v16 & insert_slb(v15, v16) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v11, v10) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (update_slb(v13, v10) = v14) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v14 & update_slb(v8, v10) = v15 & insert_slb(v15, v12) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & less_than(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (update_slb(v8, v10) = v13) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v13, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v14 & update_slb(v15, v10) = v14 & insert_slb(v8, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & less_than(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v12, v11) = v13) |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ? [v14] : ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v14)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v12, v9, v10) = v13) |  ~ (pair(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v12, v9) = v13) |  ~ (pair(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v10 = v9 |  ~ (contains_slb(v13, v10) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v9, v11) = v12) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v12) = v13) | contains_slb(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v11) |  ~ (triple(v8, v12, v10) = v13) |  ~ (update_slb(v9, v11) = v12) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = v13 & triple(v8, v9, v10) = v14 & findmin_cpq_eff(v14) = v13) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v11) = v14 & less_than(v14, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v12) = v13) |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v11, v13) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] : ((v18 = 0 & v17 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v14 & update_slb(v9, v14) = v15 & pair_in_list(v15, v11, v16) = 0 & less_than(v14, v16) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v14 & update_slb(v9, v14) = v15 & pair_in_list(v15, v11, v14) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v12, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v13 & remove_pqp(v8, v11) = v14 & triple(v14, v15, v10) = v13 & remove_slb(v9, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v11) = v14 & less_than(v14, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v12, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v16 = v13 & remove_pqp(v8, v11) = v14 & triple(v14, v15, bad) = v13 & remove_slb(v9, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v11) = v14 & strictly_less_than(v11, v14) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v12, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = v13 & triple(v8, v9, bad) = v13) | (v14 = 0 & contains_slb(v9, v11) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v12, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : (insert_pqp(v8, v11) = v14 & triple(v14, v16, v10) = v13 & pair(v11, bottom) = v15 & insert_slb(v9, v15) = v16)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v9, v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & less_than(v13, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & check_cpq(v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & succ_cpq(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & succ_cpq(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (triple(v12, v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (triple(v12, v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v12, v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v12, v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v11) = v12) |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) | findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v12) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : (findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v13 & ((v15 = v12 & triple(v8, v14, v10) = v12 & update_slb(v9, v13) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v13) = v14 & less_than(v14, v13) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v13) = v14)))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : (findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v13 & ((v15 = v12 & triple(v8, v14, bad) = v12 & update_slb(v9, v13) = v14) | (v14 = 0 & contains_slb(v9, v13) = 0)))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : (findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v13 & ((v15 = v12 & triple(v8, v14, bad) = v12 & update_slb(v9, v13) = v14) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & lookup_slb(v9, v13) = v14 & strictly_less_than(v13, v14) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & contains_slb(v9, v13) = v14)))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (contains_cpq(v12, v11) = 0) |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v12) | contains_slb(v9, v11) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (pair(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v11) = v12) | lookup_slb(v12, v9) = v10) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (pair(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v11) = v12) | remove_slb(v12, v9) = v8) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (pair(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (insert_slb(v8, v11) = v12) | isnonempty_slb(v12) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v9) = v10) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & succ_cpq(v8, v9) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v9) = v10) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & succ_cpq(v8, v9) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & less_than(v8, v9) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (less_than(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & less_than(v9, v10) = v12)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v10 = bad |  ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) | ok(v11) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (remove_pqp(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (remove_pqp(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (insert_pqp(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (insert_pqp(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (contains_cpq(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (update_slb(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (update_slb(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (lookup_slb(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (remove_slb(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (remove_slb(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (contains_slb(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (contains_slb(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (pair(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (pair(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (insert_slb(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (insert_slb(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (less_than(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (less_than(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v14 = 0 &  ~ (v15 = 0) & pair_in_list(v9, v12, v13) = 0 & less_than(v13, v12) = v15) | (v12 = 0 & check_cpq(v11) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & less_than(v9, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & less_than(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v9, v8) = v10) | less_than(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & less_than(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v8, v9) = v10) | less_than(v9, v8) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v10) = v9) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v10) = v9) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v10) = v9) |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (ok(v10) = v9) |  ~ (ok(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (check_cpq(v10) = v9) |  ~ (check_cpq(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v10) = v9) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v10) = v9) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v10) = v9) |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (triple(v8, v9, bad) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & ok(v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (triple(v8, create_slb, v9) = v10) | findmin_cpq_res(v10) = bottom) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (triple(v8, create_slb, v9) = v10) | check_cpq(v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (triple(v8, create_slb, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : (triple(v8, create_slb, bad) = v11 & findmin_cpq_eff(v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (less_than(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v8, v9) = 0) | less_than(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (less_than(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 &  ~ (v10 = 0) & less_than(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (less_than(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v10 = 0 &  ~ (v11 = 0) & less_than(v9, v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = create_slb |  ~ (update_slb(create_slb, v8) = v9)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v8) = v9)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v8, v8) = v9)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(bottom, v8) = v9)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v8) = v9) | findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v9) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v9) | removemin_cpq_res(v8) = v9) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v8) = v10 & findmin_cpq_eff(v8) = v11 & remove_cpq(v11, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : (findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v11 & findmin_cpq_eff(v8) = v10 & remove_cpq(v10, v11) = v9)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : (findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v11 & removemin_cpq_eff(v8) = v10 & remove_cpq(v9, v11) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v9) = v10 & succ_cpq(v8, v10) = 0)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : (findmin_cpq_eff(v9) = v10 & succ_cpq(v8, v10) = 0)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ~ (pair_in_list(create_slb, v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & less_than(v9, v8) = v10 & less_than(v8, v9) = 0)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (less_than(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v8, v9) = 0) | (v10 = 0 & less_than(v9, v8) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (contains_slb(create_slb, v8) = 0) &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : triple(v10, v9, v8) = v11 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : pair_in_list(v10, v9, v8) = v11 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : remove_pqp(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : insert_pqp(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : contains_cpq(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : remove_cpq(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : insert_cpq(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : succ_cpq(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : update_slb(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : lookup_slb(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : remove_slb(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : contains_slb(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : pair(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : insert_slb(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : strictly_less_than(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : less_than(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : removemin_cpq_res(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : findmin_cpq_res(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : findmin_pqp_res(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ok(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : check_cpq(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : removemin_cpq_eff(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : findmin_cpq_eff(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : isnonempty_slb(v8) = v9)
% 29.26/7.61  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 29.26/7.61  | (1)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = 0) & findmin_cpq_res(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & contains_cpq(all_0_3_3, all_0_0_0) = 0 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3 & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0 & findmin_cpq_eff(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 & isnonempty_slb(create_slb) = all_0_7_7 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = v8)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (insert_pqp(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v4, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, bottom) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v8 & insert_cpq(v8, v3) = v7)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & less_than(v4, v3) = v8) | (((v10 = 0 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v9 & check_cpq(v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & check_cpq(v7) = v8)) & ((v8 = 0 & check_cpq(v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v9 & check_cpq(v9) = v10))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & check_cpq(v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v3, v4) = v8))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less_than(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = 0) & check_cpq(v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) | pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v6 & lookup_slb(v0, v2) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (remove_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & remove_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & insert_slb(v7, v4) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (remove_slb(v0, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & remove_slb(v7, v2) = v6 & insert_slb(v0, v4) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) | pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v4, v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (remove_slb(v1, v3) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v7 & remove_cpq(v7, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v7 & less_than(v7, v3) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = v6 & update_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & pair(v1, v2) = v8 & insert_slb(v7, v8) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & update_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & insert_slb(v7, v4) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & less_than(v2, v3) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v0, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & update_slb(v7, v2) = v6 & insert_slb(v0, v4) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & less_than(v2, v3) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v4, v1) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (contains_slb(v5, v2) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) | contains_slb(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v3) |  ~ (triple(v0, v4, v2) = v5) |  ~ (update_slb(v1, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v5 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & findmin_cpq_eff(v6) = v5) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & less_than(v6, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v4) = v5) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v6 & update_slb(v1, v6) = v7 & pair_in_list(v7, v3, v8) = 0 & less_than(v6, v8) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v6 & update_slb(v1, v6) = v7 & pair_in_list(v7, v3, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v5 & remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v7, v2) = v5 & remove_slb(v1, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & less_than(v6, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v5 & remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v7, bad) = v5 & remove_slb(v1, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & strictly_less_than(v3, v6) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v5 & triple(v0, v1, bad) = v5) | (v6 = 0 & contains_slb(v1, v3) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (insert_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v8, v2) = v5 & pair(v3, bottom) = v7 & insert_slb(v1, v7) = v8)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & less_than(v5, v4) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & check_cpq(v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v4) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, v2) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v5) = v6 & less_than(v6, v5) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v5) = v6)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, bad) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | (v6 = 0 & contains_slb(v1, v5) = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, bad) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v5) = v6 & strictly_less_than(v5, v6) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v5) = v6)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (contains_cpq(v4, v3) = 0) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) | contains_slb(v1, v3) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | lookup_slb(v4, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | remove_slb(v4, v1) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | isnonempty_slb(v4) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & less_than(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = bad |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | ok(v3) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (update_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (update_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 &  ~ (v7 = 0) & pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = 0 & less_than(v5, v4) = v7) | (v4 = 0 & check_cpq(v3) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & less_than(v1, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) | less_than(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = v2) | less_than(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ok(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ok(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v1) |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) = v1) |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, bad) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ok(v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) | findmin_cpq_res(v2) = bottom) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) | check_cpq(v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (triple(v0, create_slb, bad) = v3 & findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | less_than(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 &  ~ (v2 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v1, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (update_slb(create_slb, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(bottom, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) | findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) | removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v3 & remove_cpq(v3, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v3 & findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & remove_cpq(v2, v3) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v3 & removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & remove_cpq(v1, v3) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2 & succ_cpq(v0, v2) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (findmin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2 & succ_cpq(v0, v2) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (pair_in_list(create_slb, v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & less_than(v1, v0) = v2 & less_than(v0, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | (v2 = 0 & less_than(v1, v0) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (contains_slb(create_slb, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : triple(v2, v1, v0) = v3 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : pair_in_list(v2, v1, v0) = v3 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_pqp(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_pqp(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : contains_cpq(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_cpq(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_cpq(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : succ_cpq(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : update_slb(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : lookup_slb(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_slb(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : contains_slb(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : pair(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_slb(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : strictly_less_than(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : less_than(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ok(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : check_cpq(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : isnonempty_slb(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.64  |
% 29.26/7.64  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 29.26/7.64  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v4, v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (remove_slb(v1, v3) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v7 & remove_cpq(v7, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v7 & less_than(v7, v3) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.64  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = bad |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | ok(v3) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) | pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.64  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = v6 & update_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & pair(v1, v2) = v8 & insert_slb(v7, v8) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.64  | (7)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : succ_cpq(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.64  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v1, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 29.26/7.64  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) | removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1)
% 29.26/7.64  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) | findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1)
% 29.26/7.64  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v0) = v1))
% 29.26/7.64  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | lookup_slb(v4, v1) = v2)
% 29.26/7.64  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v1) |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.64  | (14)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.64  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.64  | (16)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : pair_in_list(v2, v1, v0) = v3
% 29.26/7.64  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7))
% 29.26/7.64  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (update_slb(create_slb, v0) = v1))
% 29.26/7.64  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & less_than(v5, v4) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & check_cpq(v3) = v6)))
% 29.26/7.64  | (20)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : removemin_cpq_res(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.64  | (21)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : strictly_less_than(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.64  | (22)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : isnonempty_slb(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.64  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2 & succ_cpq(v0, v2) = 0))
% 29.26/7.64  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) | check_cpq(v2) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ~ (contains_slb(create_slb, v0) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (26)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_cpq(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.64  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = v2) | less_than(v1, v0) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) | less_than(v0, v1) = 0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (29) findmin_cpq_eff(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1
% 29.26/7.64  | (30)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : contains_cpq(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.64  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v3) |  ~ (triple(v0, v4, v2) = v5) |  ~ (update_slb(v1, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v5 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & findmin_cpq_eff(v6) = v5) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & less_than(v6, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6)))
% 29.26/7.64  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | remove_slb(v4, v1) = v0)
% 29.26/7.64  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.64  | (34)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : less_than(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.64  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) | pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = 0)
% 29.26/7.65  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v0) = v1))
% 29.26/7.65  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v4))
% 29.26/7.65  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v0, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & update_slb(v7, v2) = v6 & insert_slb(v0, v4) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & less_than(v2, v3) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.65  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v6 & lookup_slb(v0, v2) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.65  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (remove_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & remove_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & insert_slb(v7, v4) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.65  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less_than(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = 0) & check_cpq(v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.65  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v5 & remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v7, bad) = v5 & remove_slb(v1, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & strictly_less_than(v3, v6) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6)))
% 29.26/7.65  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (insert_pqp(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v4, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, bottom) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v8 & insert_cpq(v8, v3) = v7))
% 29.26/7.65  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & less_than(v1, v2) = v4))
% 29.26/7.65  | (45) isnonempty_slb(create_slb) = all_0_7_7
% 29.26/7.65  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (47)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_slb(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.65  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, bad) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ok(v2) = v3))
% 29.26/7.65  | (50)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : update_slb(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.65  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (findmin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2 & succ_cpq(v0, v2) = 0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (pair_in_list(create_slb, v0, v1) = 0)
% 29.26/7.65  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & less_than(v4, v3) = v8) | (((v10 = 0 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v9 & check_cpq(v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & check_cpq(v7) = v8)) & ((v8 = 0 & check_cpq(v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v9 & check_cpq(v9) = v10)))))
% 29.26/7.65  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (56) findmin_cpq_res(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2
% 29.26/7.65  | (57) contains_cpq(all_0_3_3, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.26/7.65  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (update_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (update_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v4, v1) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4))
% 29.26/7.65  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.65  | (61)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : pair(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.65  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v3 & removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & remove_cpq(v1, v3) = v2))
% 29.26/7.65  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v6, v2, v4) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pair_in_list(v0, v2, v4) = v8))
% 29.26/7.65  | (64)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_slb(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.65  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, bad) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v5) = v6 & strictly_less_than(v5, v6) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v5) = v6))))
% 29.26/7.66  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ok(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ok(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 &  ~ (v7 = 0) & pair_in_list(v1, v4, v5) = 0 & less_than(v5, v4) = v7) | (v4 = 0 & check_cpq(v3) = 0)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (69)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.66  | (70) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0
% 29.26/7.66  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v5 & triple(v0, v1, bad) = v5) | (v6 = 0 & contains_slb(v1, v3) = 0)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (72)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_pqp(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.66  | (73)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : contains_slb(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.66  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (75)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6))
% 29.26/7.66  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (78)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v4) = v5) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v6 & update_slb(v1, v6) = v7 & pair_in_list(v7, v3, v8) = 0 & less_than(v6, v8) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v6 & update_slb(v1, v6) = v7 & pair_in_list(v7, v3, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & less_than(v1, v0) = v2 & less_than(v0, v1) = 0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (80)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : check_cpq(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.66  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (82)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ok(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.66  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v3 & remove_cpq(v3, v1) = v2))
% 29.26/7.66  | (84)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (findmin_cpq_res(v0) = v3 & findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v2 & remove_cpq(v2, v3) = v1))
% 29.26/7.66  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (update_slb(v5, v2) = v6) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & update_slb(v0, v2) = v7 & insert_slb(v7, v4) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & less_than(v2, v3) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 29.26/7.66  | (87) strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.26/7.66  | (88)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (triple(v0, create_slb, bad) = v3 & findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v3))
% 29.26/7.66  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (contains_cpq(v4, v3) = 0) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) | contains_slb(v1, v3) = 0)
% 29.26/7.66  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (contains_slb(v5, v2) = 0) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v4) = v5) | contains_slb(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.26/7.66  | (91)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (93)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (triple(v0, create_slb, v1) = v2) | findmin_cpq_res(v2) = bottom)
% 29.26/7.66  | (95)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.66  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v5 & remove_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v7, v2) = v5 & remove_slb(v1, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v3) = v6 & less_than(v6, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v3) = v6)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (97)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v6, v2) = v7) |  ~ (pair(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (insert_slb(v1, v5) = v6) |  ? [v8] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & check_cpq(v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v3, v4) = v8)))
% 29.26/7.66  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | less_than(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.26/7.67  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4) | isnonempty_slb(v4) = 0)
% 29.26/7.67  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (insert_pqp(v0, v3) = v6 & triple(v6, v8, v2) = v5 & pair(v3, bottom) = v7 & insert_slb(v1, v7) = v8))
% 29.26/7.67  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.67  | (102)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : lookup_slb(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.67  | (103)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : remove_cpq(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.67  | (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (remove_slb(v0, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (insert_slb(v5, v4) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v8 = v6 & remove_slb(v7, v2) = v6 & insert_slb(v0, v4) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & contains_slb(v0, v2) = v7)))
% 29.26/7.67  | (105)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (less_than(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | (v2 = 0 & less_than(v1, v0) = 0)))
% 29.26/7.67  | (106)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : removemin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.67  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, v2) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & lookup_slb(v1, v5) = v6 & less_than(v6, v5) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & contains_slb(v1, v5) = v6))))
% 29.26/7.67  | (108)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v5 & ((v7 = v4 & triple(v0, v6, bad) = v4 & update_slb(v1, v5) = v6) | (v6 = 0 & contains_slb(v1, v5) = 0))))
% 29.26/7.67  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (less_than(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 &  ~ (v2 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 29.26/7.67  | (110)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (less_than(bottom, v0) = v1))
% 29.26/7.67  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.67  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_slb(v0, v3) = v4))
% 29.26/7.67  | (113)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & less_than(v1, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & less_than(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 29.26/7.67  | (114)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : findmin_cpq_eff(v0) = v1
% 29.26/7.67  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (remove_cpq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.26/7.67  | (116)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : insert_pqp(v1, v0) = v2
% 29.26/7.67  | (117)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = 0)
% 29.26/7.67  | (118) triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3
% 29.26/7.67  | (119)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v1) = v2) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 29.26/7.67  | (120)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.67  | (121)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & succ_cpq(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.26/7.67  | (122)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : triple(v2, v1, v0) = v3
% 29.26/7.67  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = create_slb |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v3) = v4) |  ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | findmin_pqp_res(v0) = v4)
% 29.26/7.67  | (124)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) = v1) |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.67  | (125)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.67  |
% 29.26/7.67  | Instantiating formula (89) with all_0_3_3, all_0_0_0, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms contains_cpq(all_0_3_3, all_0_0_0) = 0, triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 29.26/7.67  | (126) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.26/7.67  |
% 29.26/7.67  | Instantiating formula (123) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms findmin_cpq_res(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2, triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 29.26/7.67  | (127) all_0_5_5 = create_slb | findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 29.26/7.67  |
% 29.26/7.67  | Instantiating formula (107) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, findmin_cpq_eff(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 29.26/7.67  | (128) all_0_5_5 = create_slb |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & less_than(v1, v0) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1)))
% 29.26/7.67  |
% 29.26/7.67  | Instantiating formula (108) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, findmin_cpq_eff(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 29.26/7.67  | (129) all_0_5_5 = create_slb |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | (v1 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = 0)))
% 29.26/7.67  |
% 29.26/7.67  | Instantiating formula (65) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, findmin_cpq_eff(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 29.26/7.67  | (130) all_0_5_5 = create_slb |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1)))
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating formula (78) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_0_0, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms findmin_cpq_res(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2, triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (131)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & pair_in_list(v1, all_0_0_0, v2) = 0 & less_than(v0, v2) = 0) | (v2 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & pair_in_list(v1, all_0_0_0, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = v0))
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating formula (79) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (132)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating (132) with all_57_0_74 yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (133)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Applying alpha-rule on (133) yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.26/7.68  | (135) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.26/7.68  | (136) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating (131) with all_61_0_77, all_61_1_78, all_61_2_79, all_61_3_80, all_61_4_81 yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (137) (all_61_0_77 = 0 & all_61_1_78 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0 & less_than(all_61_4_81, all_61_2_79) = 0) | (all_61_2_79 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_4_81) = 0) | ( ~ (all_61_4_81 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = all_61_4_81)
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating formula (109) with 0, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (138)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (139) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating formula (8) with all_57_0_74, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (140)  ? [v0] : ((all_57_0_74 = 0 &  ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = v0))
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating (140) with all_74_0_88 yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (141) (all_57_0_74 = 0 &  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_88) | ( ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88)
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Instantiating (138) with all_75_0_89 yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (142)  ~ (all_75_0_89 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_75_0_89
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  | Applying alpha-rule on (142) yields:
% 29.26/7.68  | (143)  ~ (all_75_0_89 = 0)
% 29.26/7.68  | (144) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_75_0_89
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 29.26/7.68  |-Branch one:
% 29.26/7.68  | (145) all_57_0_74 = 0 &  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_88
% 29.26/7.68  |
% 29.26/7.68  	| Applying alpha-rule on (145) yields:
% 29.26/7.68  	| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.26/7.68  	| (147)  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0)
% 29.26/7.68  	| (148) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_88
% 29.26/7.68  	|
% 29.26/7.68  	| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.26/7.68  	| (149) $false
% 29.26/7.68  	|
% 29.71/7.68  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.68  |-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.68  | (150)  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88
% 29.71/7.69  |
% 29.71/7.69  	| Applying alpha-rule on (150) yields:
% 29.71/7.69  	| (147)  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0)
% 29.71/7.69  	| (152) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88
% 29.71/7.69  	|
% 29.71/7.69  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (139), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.69  	|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.69  	| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.71/7.69  	|
% 29.71/7.69  		| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (149) $false
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.69  	|-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.69  	| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.71/7.69  	| (156)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.71/7.69  	|
% 29.71/7.69  		| Instantiating formula (93) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_74_0_88, all_75_0_89 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_75_0_89, strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88, yields:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (157) all_75_0_89 = all_74_0_88
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  		| Equations (157) can reduce 143 to:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (147)  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0)
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  		| From (157) and (144) follows:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (152) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  		| Instantiating formula (113) with all_74_0_88, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_74_0_88, yields:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (160) all_74_0_88 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = v0))
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.69  		|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.69  		| (161) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.69  		|
% 29.71/7.69  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.69  			|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.69  			| (162) all_74_0_88 = 0
% 29.71/7.69  			|
% 29.71/7.69  				| Equations (162) can reduce 147 to:
% 29.71/7.69  				| (149) $false
% 29.71/7.69  				|
% 29.71/7.69  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.69  			|-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.69  			| (147)  ~ (all_74_0_88 = 0)
% 29.71/7.69  			| (165)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = v0))
% 29.71/7.69  			|
% 29.71/7.69  				| Instantiating (165) with all_101_0_91 yields:
% 29.71/7.69  				| (166) (all_101_0_91 = 0 & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_101_0_91 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_101_0_91)
% 29.71/7.69  				|
% 29.71/7.69  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (130), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.69  				|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.69  				| (167) all_0_5_5 = create_slb
% 29.71/7.69  				|
% 29.71/7.69  					| From (167) and (126) follows:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (168) contains_slb(create_slb, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms contains_slb(create_slb, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (169) $false
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.69  				|-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.69  				| (170)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = create_slb)
% 29.71/7.69  				| (171)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & strictly_less_than(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1)))
% 29.71/7.69  				|
% 29.71/7.69  					| Instantiating (171) with all_109_0_92, all_109_1_93, all_109_2_94 yields:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (172) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_109_2_94 & ((all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93) | ( ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92) | ( ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93))
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  					| Applying alpha-rule on (172) yields:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (173) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_109_2_94
% 29.71/7.69  					| (174) (all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93) | ( ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92) | ( ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93)
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (128), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.69  					|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (167) all_0_5_5 = create_slb
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  						| Equations (167) can reduce 170 to:
% 29.71/7.69  						| (149) $false
% 29.71/7.69  						|
% 29.71/7.69  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.69  					|-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.69  					| (170)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = create_slb)
% 29.71/7.69  					| (178)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1 & less_than(v1, v0) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1)))
% 29.71/7.69  					|
% 29.71/7.69  						| Instantiating (178) with all_115_0_95, all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97 yields:
% 29.71/7.69  						| (179) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_115_2_97 & ((all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96) | ( ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95) | ( ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96))
% 29.71/7.70  						|
% 29.71/7.70  						| Applying alpha-rule on (179) yields:
% 29.71/7.70  						| (180) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_115_2_97
% 29.71/7.70  						| (181) (all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96) | ( ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95) | ( ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96)
% 29.71/7.70  						|
% 29.71/7.70  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (129), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.70  						|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.70  						| (167) all_0_5_5 = create_slb
% 29.71/7.70  						|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Equations (167) can reduce 170 to:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (149) $false
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.71/7.70  						|-Branch two:
% 29.71/7.70  						| (170)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = create_slb)
% 29.71/7.70  						| (185)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = v0 & ((v2 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, v1, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1) | (v1 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, v0) = 0)))
% 29.71/7.70  						|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Instantiating (185) with all_120_0_98, all_120_1_99, all_120_2_100 yields:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (186) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_120_2_100 & ((all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99) | (all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0))
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Applying alpha-rule on (186) yields:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (187) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_120_2_100
% 29.71/7.70  							| (188) (all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99) | (all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0)
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_6_6, all_120_2_100, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_120_2_100, findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (189) all_120_2_100 = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_6_6, all_115_2_97, all_120_2_100 and discharging atoms findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_120_2_100, findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_115_2_97, yields:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (190) all_120_2_100 = all_115_2_97
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_6_6, all_109_2_94, all_120_2_100 and discharging atoms findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_120_2_100, findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_109_2_94, yields:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (191) all_120_2_100 = all_109_2_94
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Combining equations (191,190) yields a new equation:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (192) all_115_2_97 = all_109_2_94
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Combining equations (189,190) yields a new equation:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (193) all_115_2_97 = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Combining equations (193,192) yields a new equation:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (194) all_109_2_94 = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Combining equations (194,192) yields a new equation:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (193) all_115_2_97 = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| Combining equations (193,190) yields a new equation:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (189) all_120_2_100 = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							| From (194) and (173) follows:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (161) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 29.71/7.70  							|
% 29.71/7.70  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 29.71/7.70  							|-Branch one:
% 29.71/7.70  							| (198) (all_61_0_77 = 0 & all_61_1_78 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0 & less_than(all_61_4_81, all_61_2_79) = 0) | (all_61_2_79 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_4_81) = 0)
% 29.80/7.70  							|
% 29.80/7.70  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.70  								|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.70  								| (199) all_61_0_77 = 0 & all_61_1_78 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0 & less_than(all_61_4_81, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.70  								|
% 29.80/7.70  									| Applying alpha-rule on (199) yields:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (200) less_than(all_61_4_81, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									| (201) all_61_1_78 = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									| (202) pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									| (203) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81
% 29.80/7.70  									| (204) all_61_0_77 = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									| (205) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_6_6, all_61_4_81, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81, findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (206) all_61_4_81 = all_0_2_2
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									| From (206) and (205) follows:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (207) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									| From (206) and (200) follows:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (208) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									| Instantiating formula (98) with all_61_2_79, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (209) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									| Instantiating formula (44) with all_57_0_74, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_61_2_79) = 0, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (210) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.70  									|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.70  									| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.80/7.70  									|
% 29.80/7.70  										| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.71  									|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.71  									| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  									| (214)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.80/7.71  									|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating (214) with all_197_0_112 yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (215)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Applying alpha-rule on (215) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  										| (217) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating formula (41) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (218) all_197_0_112 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating formula (74) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (219) all_197_0_112 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating formula (109) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (220)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 &  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating formula (105) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (221)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating formula (8) with 0, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (222)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = v0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating (222) with all_204_0_113 yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (223) ( ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_204_0_113) | ( ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_204_0_113)
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating (221) with all_205_0_114 yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (224) (all_205_0_114 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | (all_205_0_114 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										| Instantiating (220) with all_209_0_117 yields:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (225) (all_209_0_117 = 0 &  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | ( ~ (all_209_0_117 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_209_0_117)
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.71  										|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  											| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.80/7.71  											| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.71  											|
% 29.80/7.71  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.71  										|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.71  										| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  										| (229)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.71  										|
% 29.80/7.71  											| Instantiating (229) with all_214_0_118 yields:
% 29.80/7.71  											| (230) (all_214_0_118 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0) | ( ~ (all_214_0_118 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_214_0_118)
% 29.80/7.71  											|
% 29.80/7.71  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.71  											|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.71  											| (231) all_205_0_114 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  											|
% 29.80/7.71  												| Applying alpha-rule on (231) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  												| (232) all_205_0_114 = 0
% 29.80/7.71  												| (233) strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  												|
% 29.80/7.71  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.71  												|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.71  												| (234) all_209_0_117 = 0 &  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  												|
% 29.80/7.71  													| Applying alpha-rule on (234) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  													| (235) all_209_0_117 = 0
% 29.80/7.71  													| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  													| (209) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  													|
% 29.80/7.71  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.71  													|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.71  													| (238) all_214_0_118 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  													|
% 29.80/7.71  														| Applying alpha-rule on (238) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  														| (239) all_214_0_118 = 0
% 29.80/7.71  														| (233) strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0
% 29.80/7.71  														|
% 29.80/7.71  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.71  														|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.71  														| (241)  ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_204_0_113
% 29.80/7.71  														|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Applying alpha-rule on (241) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (242)  ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  															| (243) strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_204_0_113
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Instantiating formula (93) with all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79, 0, all_204_0_113 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_204_0_113, strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (244) all_204_0_113 = 0
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Equations (244) can reduce 242 to:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.71  														|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.71  														| (246)  ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0) & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_204_0_113
% 29.80/7.71  														|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Applying alpha-rule on (246) yields:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (242)  ~ (all_204_0_113 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  															| (248) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_204_0_113
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_204_0_113, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_204_0_113, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (249) all_204_0_113 = all_197_0_112
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															| Equations (249) can reduce 242 to:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.80/7.71  															|
% 29.80/7.71  															| From (249) and (248) follows:
% 29.80/7.71  															| (217) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112
% 29.80/7.72  															|
% 29.80/7.72  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.72  															|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.72  															| (252) (all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93) | ( ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92)
% 29.80/7.72  															|
% 29.80/7.72  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.72  																|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.72  																| (253) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.80/7.72  																|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (253) yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (254) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (255) triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (256) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| From (194) and (256) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (257) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (258) all_109_1_93 = all_61_3_80
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| From (258) and (255) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (260)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| Instantiating (260) with all_302_0_161 yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (261) (all_302_0_161 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_161 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_161)
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.72  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (262) all_302_0_161 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (262) yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (263) all_302_0_161 = 0
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (264) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, 0, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.72  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (267)  ~ (all_302_0_161 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_161
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (267) yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (268)  ~ (all_302_0_161 = 0)
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (269) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_161
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_302_0_161, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_161, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (263) all_302_0_161 = 0
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Equations (263) can reduce 268 to:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.72  																|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.72  																| (272)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.80/7.72  																|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (274) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (275) strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| From (194) and (274) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (276) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	| From (194) and (275) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (277) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.72  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.72  																	| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.80/7.72  																	|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (285) all_197_0_112 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.72  																		|
% 29.80/7.72  																		| Instantiating formula (19) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.72  																		| (260)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																		| Instantiating (260) with all_302_0_194 yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (287) (all_302_0_194 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_194 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_194)
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.73  																		|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																			| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.80/7.73  																			| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.73  																			|
% 29.80/7.73  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.73  																		|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (291)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.73  																			|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.73  																			| (292) all_302_0_194 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																			|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (292) yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (293) all_302_0_194 = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (264) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, 0, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.73  																			|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.73  																			| (297)  ~ (all_302_0_194 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_194
% 29.80/7.73  																			|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (297) yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (298)  ~ (all_302_0_194 = 0)
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (299) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_194
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_302_0_194, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_302_0_194, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (293) all_302_0_194 = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Equations (293) can reduce 298 to:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (149) $false
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.80/7.73  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.80/7.73  																	| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																	|
% 29.80/7.73  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																		| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.73  																		|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.73  																		| (306) (all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96) | ( ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95)
% 29.80/7.73  																		|
% 29.80/7.73  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 29.80/7.73  																			|-Branch one:
% 29.80/7.73  																			| (307) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.80/7.73  																			|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (307) yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (308) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (309) triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (310) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| From (193) and (310) follows:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (311) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (312) all_115_1_96 = all_61_3_80
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| From (312) and (309) follows:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (313) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Instantiating formula (41) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (285) all_197_0_112 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.80/7.73  																				|
% 29.80/7.73  																				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.80/7.73  																				| (260)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.73  																				|
% 29.94/7.73  																				| Instantiating (260) with all_297_0_226 yields:
% 29.94/7.73  																				| (316) (all_297_0_226 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_297_0_226 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_297_0_226)
% 29.94/7.73  																				|
% 29.94/7.73  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.73  																				|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.73  																				| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.73  																				|
% 29.94/7.73  																					| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.73  																					| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.73  																					|
% 29.94/7.73  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.73  																				|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.73  																				| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.94/7.73  																				| (291)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.94/7.73  																				|
% 29.94/7.73  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.73  																					|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.73  																					| (321) all_297_0_226 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																					|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (321) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (322) all_297_0_226 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (264) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, 0, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																					|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																					| (326)  ~ (all_297_0_226 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_297_0_226
% 29.94/7.74  																					|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (326) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (327)  ~ (all_297_0_226 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (328) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_297_0_226
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_297_0_226, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_297_0_226, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (322) all_297_0_226 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Equations (322) can reduce 327 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																			|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																			| (331)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.74  																			|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (331) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (333) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (334) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| From (193) and (333) follows:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (335) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| From (193) and (334) follows:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (336) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (337) all_115_1_96 = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| From (337) and (336) follows:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (338) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| Instantiating formula (113) with all_109_0_92, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (339) all_109_0_92 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| Instantiating formula (28) with all_115_0_95, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (340) all_115_0_95 = 0 | less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				| Instantiating formula (74) with all_115_0_95, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (341) all_115_0_95 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.74  																				|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (342) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (341), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.74  																					|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.74  																					| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																					|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																					|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																					| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																					| (346)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.74  																					|
% 29.94/7.74  																						| Instantiating (346) with all_316_0_260 yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (347) (all_316_0_260 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0) | ( ~ (all_316_0_260 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_316_0_260)
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (347), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.74  																						|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (348) all_316_0_260 = 0 & strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (348) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (349) all_316_0_260 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (350) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.74  																							|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (351) all_109_0_92 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																								| Equations (351) can reduce 273 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																								| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																								|
% 29.94/7.74  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																							|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (354)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																								| Instantiating formula (93) with all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93, 0, all_109_0_92 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92, strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																								| (351) all_109_0_92 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																								|
% 29.94/7.74  																								| Equations (351) can reduce 273 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																								| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																								|
% 29.94/7.74  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																						|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																						| (357)  ~ (all_316_0_260 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_316_0_260
% 29.94/7.74  																						|
% 29.94/7.74  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (357) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (358)  ~ (all_316_0_260 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (359) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_316_0_260
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																							| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93, 0, all_316_0_260 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_316_0_260, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (349) all_316_0_260 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																							| Equations (349) can reduce 358 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																							| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																							|
% 29.94/7.74  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																				|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (362)  ~ (less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																				| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.74  																				|
% 29.94/7.74  																					| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.74  																					| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.74  																					|
% 29.94/7.74  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.74  																		|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.74  																		| (365)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.74  																		|
% 29.94/7.74  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (365) yields:
% 29.94/7.74  																			| (366)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0)
% 29.94/7.74  																			| (367) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.74  																			|
% 29.94/7.74  																			| From (193) and (367) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (368) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, 0 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (369) all_115_1_96 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			| Equations (369) can reduce 366 to:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  															|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  															| (371)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  															|
% 29.94/7.75  																| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																| (372)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  																| (373) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  																|
% 29.94/7.75  																| From (194) and (373) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  																| (374) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  																|
% 29.94/7.75  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  																|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  																| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.75  																|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Instantiating formula (41) with all_197_0_112, all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (285) all_197_0_112 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (260)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Instantiating (260) with all_300_0_268 yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (384) (all_300_0_268 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_300_0_268 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_300_0_268)
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (385) all_300_0_268 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (385) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (386) all_300_0_268 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (264) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  																		|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																			| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  																		|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (291)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, 0, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.75  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  																			|
% 29.94/7.75  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (394)  ~ (all_300_0_268 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_300_0_268
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (394) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (395)  ~ (all_300_0_268 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (396) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_300_0_268
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																		| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_300_0_268, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_300_0_268, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (386) all_300_0_268 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																		| Equations (386) can reduce 395 to:
% 29.94/7.75  																		| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  																		|
% 29.94/7.75  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  																|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  																| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (403) all_109_1_93 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	| Equations (403) can reduce 372 to:
% 29.94/7.75  																	| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  																	|
% 29.94/7.75  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (405)  ~ (all_214_0_118 = 0) & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_214_0_118
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  														| Applying alpha-rule on (405) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  														| (406)  ~ (all_214_0_118 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  														| (407) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_214_0_118
% 29.94/7.75  														|
% 29.94/7.75  														| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79, all_214_0_118, 0 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_214_0_118, less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  														| (239) all_214_0_118 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  														|
% 29.94/7.75  														| Equations (239) can reduce 406 to:
% 29.94/7.75  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  														|
% 29.94/7.75  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (410)  ~ (all_209_0_117 = 0) & strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_209_0_117
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Applying alpha-rule on (410) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (411)  ~ (all_209_0_117 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  													| (412) strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_209_0_117
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Instantiating formula (93) with all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79, 0, all_209_0_117 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = all_209_0_117, strictly_less_than(all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (235) all_209_0_117 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Equations (235) can reduce 411 to:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  											|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  											| (415) all_205_0_114 = 0 & less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  											|
% 29.94/7.75  												| Applying alpha-rule on (415) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (232) all_205_0_114 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  												| (264) less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (216)  ~ (all_197_0_112 = 0)
% 29.94/7.75  												| (421)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0, all_61_2_79) = v0))
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Instantiating formula (15) with all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0, 0, all_197_0_112 and discharging atoms less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = all_197_0_112, less_than(all_61_2_79, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (226) all_197_0_112 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													| Equations (226) can reduce 216 to:
% 29.94/7.75  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.75  													|
% 29.94/7.75  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.75  								|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.75  								| (424) all_61_2_79 = 0 & findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80 & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_4_81) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  								|
% 29.94/7.75  									| Applying alpha-rule on (424) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  									| (425) all_61_2_79 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  									| (203) findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81
% 29.94/7.75  									| (205) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_61_4_81) = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.75  									| (428) pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_61_4_81) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  									|
% 29.94/7.75  									| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_6_6, all_61_4_81, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_61_4_81, findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 29.94/7.75  									| (206) all_61_4_81 = all_0_2_2
% 29.94/7.75  									|
% 29.94/7.75  									| From (206) and (205) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  									| (207) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.75  									|
% 29.94/7.75  									| From (206) and (428) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  									| (431) pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  									|
% 29.94/7.75  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  									|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  									| (432) all_101_0_91 = 0 & less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  									|
% 29.94/7.75  										| Applying alpha-rule on (432) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  										| (433) all_101_0_91 = 0
% 29.94/7.75  										| (135) less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.75  										|
% 29.94/7.75  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  										|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  										| (252) (all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93) | ( ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92)
% 29.94/7.75  										|
% 29.94/7.75  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.75  											|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.75  											| (253) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  											|
% 29.94/7.75  												| Applying alpha-rule on (253) yields:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (254) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.75  												| (255) triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.75  												| (256) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  												| From (194) and (256) follows:
% 29.94/7.75  												| (257) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.75  												|
% 29.94/7.75  												| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (258) all_109_1_93 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| From (258) and (255) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| Instantiating (444) with all_222_0_321 yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (445) (all_222_0_321 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_222_0_321 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_222_0_321)
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  													| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.76  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  													|
% 29.94/7.76  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  												| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (445), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  													| (450) all_222_0_321 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  													|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Applying alpha-rule on (450) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (451) all_222_0_321 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  													| (455)  ~ (all_222_0_321 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_222_0_321
% 29.94/7.76  													|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Applying alpha-rule on (455) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (456)  ~ (all_222_0_321 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  														| (457) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_222_0_321
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_222_0_321, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_222_0_321, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (451) all_222_0_321 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Equations (451) can reduce 456 to:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  											|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  											| (272)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.76  											|
% 29.94/7.76  												| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  												| (274) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.76  												| (275) strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| From (194) and (274) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (276) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| From (194) and (275) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (277) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												| Instantiating formula (113) with all_109_0_92, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (339) all_109_0_92 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  												| (306) (all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96) | ( ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95)
% 29.94/7.76  												|
% 29.94/7.76  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  													| (307) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.76  													|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Applying alpha-rule on (307) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (308) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.76  														| (309) triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.76  														| (310) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| From (193) and (310) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (311) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (312) all_115_1_96 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| From (312) and (309) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (313) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Instantiating (444) with all_232_0_340 yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (477) (all_232_0_340 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_232_0_340 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_340)
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  														|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  															| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  														|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  														| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (477), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  															|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (482) all_232_0_340 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Applying alpha-rule on (482) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (483) all_232_0_340 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  															|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (487)  ~ (all_232_0_340 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_340
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Applying alpha-rule on (487) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (488)  ~ (all_232_0_340 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  																| (489) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_340
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_232_0_340, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_340, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (483) all_232_0_340 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Equations (483) can reduce 488 to:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  													| (331)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.76  													|
% 29.94/7.76  														| Applying alpha-rule on (331) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  														| (333) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.76  														| (334) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| From (193) and (333) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (335) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														| From (193) and (334) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (336) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  														|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (351) all_109_0_92 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  															| Equations (351) can reduce 273 to:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  														|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  														| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.94/7.76  														| (354)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.76  														|
% 29.94/7.76  															| Instantiating (354) with all_220_0_355 yields:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (502) (all_220_0_355 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_220_0_355 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_220_0_355)
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  															| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (337) all_115_1_96 = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  															| From (337) and (336) follows:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (338) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.76  															|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (505) all_220_0_355 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Applying alpha-rule on (505) yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (506) all_220_0_355 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																| (507) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Instantiating formula (15) with all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, 0, all_115_0_95 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.76  																| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.76  																|
% 29.94/7.76  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.76  															|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.76  															| (510)  ~ (all_220_0_355 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_220_0_355
% 29.94/7.76  															|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Applying alpha-rule on (510) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (511)  ~ (all_220_0_355 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  																| (512) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_220_0_355
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Instantiating formula (41) with all_115_0_95, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (513) all_115_0_95 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Instantiating formula (37) with all_115_0_95, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (514) all_115_0_95 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Instantiating formula (28) with all_220_0_355, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_220_0_355, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (515) all_220_0_355 = 0 | less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  																|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																	| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																	| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																	|
% 29.94/7.77  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  																|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  																| (519)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  																	| (507) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																	|
% 29.94/7.77  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (513), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  																		|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  																		| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																		|
% 29.94/7.77  																			| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																			|
% 29.94/7.77  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  																		|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  																		| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  																		| (524)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  																		|
% 29.94/7.77  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, 0, all_115_0_95 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																			| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																			|
% 29.94/7.77  																			| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																			|
% 29.94/7.77  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  																	| (527)  ~ (less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  																	| (506) all_220_0_355 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																	|
% 29.94/7.77  																		| Equations (506) can reduce 511 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																		| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																		|
% 29.94/7.77  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (365)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  													| Applying alpha-rule on (365) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (366)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  													| (367) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  													| From (193) and (367) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (368) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  														| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  														| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Instantiating (444) with all_240_0_377 yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (543) (all_240_0_377 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_240_0_377 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_240_0_377)
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  														|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  															| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.77  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  															|
% 29.94/7.77  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  														|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  														| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  															|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  															| (548) all_240_0_377 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  															|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Applying alpha-rule on (548) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (549) all_240_0_377 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  															|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  															| (553)  ~ (all_240_0_377 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_240_0_377
% 29.94/7.77  															|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Applying alpha-rule on (553) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (554)  ~ (all_240_0_377 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  																| (555) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_240_0_377
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_240_0_377, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_240_0_377, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (549) all_240_0_377 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																| Equations (549) can reduce 554 to:
% 29.94/7.77  																| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  																|
% 29.94/7.77  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_115_1_96 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (369) all_115_1_96 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Equations (369) can reduce 366 to:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  														|
% 29.94/7.77  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  										|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  										| (371)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.77  										|
% 29.94/7.77  											| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  											| (372)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  											| (373) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.77  											|
% 29.94/7.77  											| From (194) and (373) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  											| (374) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.77  											|
% 29.94/7.77  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  											|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  											| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  											|
% 29.94/7.77  												| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  												| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  												| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												| Instantiating (444) with all_228_0_399 yields:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (577) (all_228_0_399 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_228_0_399 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_228_0_399)
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  													| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.77  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.77  												| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.77  												| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.77  												|
% 29.94/7.77  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (577), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.77  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.77  													| (582) all_228_0_399 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.77  													|
% 29.94/7.77  														| Applying alpha-rule on (582) yields:
% 29.94/7.77  														| (583) all_228_0_399 = 0
% 29.94/7.77  														| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (587)  ~ (all_228_0_399 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_228_0_399
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (587) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (588)  ~ (all_228_0_399 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  														| (589) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_228_0_399
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_228_0_399, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_228_0_399, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (583) all_228_0_399 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Equations (583) can reduce 588 to:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  											|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  											| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  											|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  												| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (403) all_109_1_93 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Equations (403) can reduce 372 to:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  									|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  									| (598)  ~ (all_101_0_91 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_101_0_91
% 29.94/7.78  									|
% 29.94/7.78  										| Applying alpha-rule on (598) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  										| (599)  ~ (all_101_0_91 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  										| (600) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_101_0_91
% 29.94/7.78  										|
% 29.94/7.78  										| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_101_0_91, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_101_0_91, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  										| (601) all_101_0_91 = all_57_0_74
% 29.94/7.78  										|
% 29.94/7.78  										| Equations (601) can reduce 599 to:
% 29.94/7.78  										| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  										|
% 29.94/7.78  										| From (601) and (600) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  										| (136) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74
% 29.94/7.78  										|
% 29.94/7.78  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  										|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  										| (252) (all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93) | ( ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92)
% 29.94/7.78  										|
% 29.94/7.78  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  											|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  											| (253) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.78  											|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (253) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (254) all_109_0_92 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  												| (255) triple(all_0_6_6, all_109_1_93, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  												| (256) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| From (194) and (256) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (257) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (258) all_109_1_93 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| From (258) and (255) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating (444) with all_226_0_413 yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (614) (all_226_0_413 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_226_0_413 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_226_0_413)
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  												| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (614), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (619) all_226_0_413 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (619) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (620) all_226_0_413 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (624)  ~ (all_226_0_413 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_226_0_413
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (624) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (625)  ~ (all_226_0_413 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  														| (626) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_226_0_413
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_226_0_413, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_226_0_413, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (620) all_226_0_413 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Equations (620) can reduce 625 to:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  											|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  											| (272)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93 & strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.78  											|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  												| (274) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.78  												| (275) strictly_less_than(all_109_2_94, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| From (194) and (274) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (276) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| From (194) and (275) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (277) strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												| Instantiating formula (113) with all_109_0_92, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms strictly_less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_109_0_92, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (339) all_109_0_92 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  												| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.78  												|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  													| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  													| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													| Instantiating (444) with all_238_0_433 yields:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (645) (all_238_0_433 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_238_0_433 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_433)
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (645), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (646) all_238_0_433 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (646) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (647) all_238_0_433 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.78  														|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  															| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.78  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  															|
% 29.94/7.78  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  														|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  														| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  															| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  															| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  															|
% 29.94/7.78  															| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.78  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  															|
% 29.94/7.78  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.78  													| (655)  ~ (all_238_0_433 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_433
% 29.94/7.78  													|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (655) yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (656)  ~ (all_238_0_433 = 0)
% 29.94/7.78  														| (657) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_433
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_238_0_433, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_433, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (647) all_238_0_433 = 0
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														| Equations (647) can reduce 656 to:
% 29.94/7.78  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.78  														|
% 29.94/7.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.78  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  												| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  												|
% 29.94/7.79  													| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  													| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  													| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  													|
% 29.94/7.79  													| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  													| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  													|
% 29.94/7.79  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  													| (351) all_109_0_92 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  													|
% 29.94/7.79  														| Equations (351) can reduce 273 to:
% 29.94/7.79  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  														|
% 29.94/7.79  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  													| (273)  ~ (all_109_0_92 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  													| (354)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  													|
% 29.94/7.79  														| Instantiating (354) with all_224_0_445 yields:
% 29.94/7.79  														| (668) (all_224_0_445 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_224_0_445 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_224_0_445)
% 29.94/7.79  														|
% 29.94/7.79  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  														|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  														| (306) (all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96) | ( ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95)
% 29.94/7.79  														|
% 29.94/7.79  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  															|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (307) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (307) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (308) all_115_0_95 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.79  																| (309) triple(all_0_6_6, all_115_1_96, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.79  																| (310) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| From (193) and (310) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (311) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (312) all_115_1_96 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| From (312) and (309) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (313) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Instantiating (444) with all_244_0_457 yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (679) (all_244_0_457 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_244_0_457 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_244_0_457)
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (679), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (680) all_244_0_457 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (680) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (681) all_244_0_457 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																		| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																		| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (689)  ~ (all_244_0_457 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_244_0_457
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (689) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (690)  ~ (all_244_0_457 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (691) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_244_0_457
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_244_0_457, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_244_0_457, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (681) all_244_0_457 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Equations (681) can reduce 690 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  															|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (331)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0) & lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96 & less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (331) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																| (333) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  																| (334) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_115_2_97) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| From (193) and (333) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (335) lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| From (193) and (334) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (336) less_than(all_115_1_96, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, lookup_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (337) all_115_1_96 = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																| From (337) and (336) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (338) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (668), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (702) all_224_0_445 = 0 & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (702) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (703) all_224_0_445 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (507) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Instantiating formula (15) with all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, 0, all_115_0_95 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																| (707)  ~ (all_224_0_445 = 0) & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_224_0_445
% 29.94/7.79  																|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (707) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (708)  ~ (all_224_0_445 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (709) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_224_0_445
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Instantiating formula (41) with all_115_0_95, all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (513) all_115_0_95 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Instantiating formula (37) with all_115_0_95, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (514) all_115_0_95 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	| Instantiating formula (28) with all_224_0_445, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = all_224_0_445, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (712) all_224_0_445 = 0 | less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (712), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (507) less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (513), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																		|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																			| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																			| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																			|
% 29.94/7.79  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																		|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (524)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_109_1_93) = v0))
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.79  																			|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.79  																			| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																			|
% 29.94/7.79  																				| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																				| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																				|
% 29.94/7.79  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																			|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																			| (332)  ~ (all_115_0_95 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																			| (519)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 29.94/7.79  																			|
% 29.94/7.79  																				| Instantiating formula (15) with all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2, 0, all_115_0_95 and discharging atoms less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = all_115_0_95, less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  																				| (343) all_115_0_95 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																				|
% 29.94/7.79  																				| Equations (343) can reduce 332 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																				| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																				|
% 29.94/7.79  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  																	|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (527)  ~ (less_than(all_109_1_93, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  																	| (703) all_224_0_445 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  																	|
% 29.94/7.79  																		| Equations (703) can reduce 708 to:
% 29.94/7.79  																		| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  																		|
% 29.94/7.79  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  														|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  														| (365)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  														|
% 29.94/7.79  															| Applying alpha-rule on (365) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (366)  ~ (all_115_1_96 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  															| (367) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_115_2_97) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  															| From (193) and (367) follows:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (368) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  															| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_115_1_96, 0 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_115_1_96, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (369) all_115_1_96 = 0
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  															| Equations (369) can reduce 366 to:
% 29.94/7.79  															| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.79  															|
% 29.94/7.79  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.79  										|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.79  										| (371)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.79  										|
% 29.94/7.79  											| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 29.94/7.79  											| (372)  ~ (all_109_1_93 = 0)
% 29.94/7.79  											| (373) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_109_2_94) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.79  											|
% 29.94/7.79  											| From (194) and (373) follows:
% 29.94/7.80  											| (374) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93
% 29.94/7.80  											|
% 29.94/7.80  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.80  											|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.80  											| (278) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1 & triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1 & update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.80  											|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (279) all_120_0_98 = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.80  												| (280) triple(all_0_6_6, all_120_1_99, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.80  												| (281) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| From (189) and (281) follows:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (282) update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_120_1_99, all_61_3_80 and discharging atoms update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_120_1_99, update_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_61_3_80, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (283) all_120_1_99 = all_61_3_80
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| From (283) and (280) follows:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (259) triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Instantiating formula (41) with all_57_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (443) all_57_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, bad, all_61_3_80, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms triple(all_0_6_6, all_61_3_80, bad) = all_0_1_1, pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0))
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Instantiating (444) with all_232_0_482 yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (746) (all_232_0_482 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0) | ( ~ (all_232_0_482 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_482)
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.80  												|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  													| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.80  													| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.80  													|
% 29.94/7.80  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  												|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (134)  ~ (all_57_0_74 = 0)
% 29.94/7.80  												| (449)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & pair_in_list(all_61_3_80, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (746), into two cases.
% 29.94/7.80  													|-Branch one:
% 29.94/7.80  													| (751) all_232_0_482 = 0 & less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  													|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Applying alpha-rule on (751) yields:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (752) all_232_0_482 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  														| (452) less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, 0, all_57_0_74 and discharging atoms less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = all_57_0_74, less_than(all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (146) all_57_0_74 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Equations (146) can reduce 134 to:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  													|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.80  													| (756)  ~ (all_232_0_482 = 0) & check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_482
% 29.94/7.80  													|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Applying alpha-rule on (756) yields:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (757)  ~ (all_232_0_482 = 0)
% 29.94/7.80  														| (758) check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_482
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_1_1, all_232_0_482, 0 and discharging atoms check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = all_232_0_482, check_cpq(all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (752) all_232_0_482 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														| Equations (752) can reduce 757 to:
% 29.94/7.80  														| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.80  														|
% 29.94/7.80  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  											|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.80  											| (302) all_120_1_99 = 0 & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  											|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (303) all_120_1_99 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  												| (304) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_120_2_100) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| From (189) and (304) follows:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (305) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_109_1_93 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_109_1_93, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (403) all_109_1_93 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												| Equations (403) can reduce 372 to:
% 29.94/7.80  												| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.80  												|
% 29.94/7.80  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  							|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.80  							| (767)  ~ (all_61_4_81 = 0) & contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = all_61_4_81
% 29.94/7.80  							|
% 29.94/7.80  								| Applying alpha-rule on (767) yields:
% 29.94/7.80  								| (768)  ~ (all_61_4_81 = 0)
% 29.94/7.80  								| (769) contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = all_61_4_81
% 29.94/7.80  								|
% 29.94/7.80  								| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0, all_61_4_81, 0 and discharging atoms contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = all_61_4_81, contains_slb(all_0_5_5, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  								| (770) all_61_4_81 = 0
% 29.94/7.80  								|
% 29.94/7.80  								| Equations (770) can reduce 768 to:
% 29.94/7.80  								| (149) $false
% 29.94/7.80  								|
% 29.94/7.80  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  		|-Branch two:
% 29.94/7.80  		| (772)  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2)
% 29.94/7.80  		| (167) all_0_5_5 = create_slb
% 29.94/7.80  		|
% 29.94/7.80  			| From (167) and (126) follows:
% 29.94/7.80  			| (168) contains_slb(create_slb, all_0_0_0) = 0
% 29.94/7.80  			|
% 29.94/7.80  			| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms contains_slb(create_slb, all_0_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 29.94/7.80  			| (169) $false
% 29.94/7.80  			|
% 29.94/7.80  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.94/7.80  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 29.94/7.80  
% 29.94/7.80  7136ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------