%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV412+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l48_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
& strictly_less_than(X2,X4)
& pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
=> pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l48_co) ).
fof(l48_li3839,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
& pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
=> pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l48_li3839) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
& strictly_less_than(X2,X4)
& pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3) )
=> pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l48_co]) ).
fof(c_0_3,lemma,
! [X17,X18,X19,X20] :
( pair_in_list(update_slb(X17,X20),X18,X20)
| ~ strictly_less_than(X19,X20)
| ~ pair_in_list(X17,X18,X19) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l48_li3839])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0)
& strictly_less_than(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& strictly_less_than(esk2_0,esk4_0)
& pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,lemma,
( ~ strictly_less_than(X3,X4)
| ~ pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3)
| pair_in_list(update_slb(X1,X4),X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ strictly_less_than(esk3_0,X1)
| pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X1),esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
strictly_less_than(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV412+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:45:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % new_bool_1 with pid 2186024 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2186026 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.12/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7
% 0.12/0.43 % Initial clauses : 23
% 0.12/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.12/0.43 % Processed clauses : 89
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % ...subsumed : 44
% 0.12/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 0.12/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.12/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Generated clauses : 275
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 175
% 0.12/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.12/0.43 % Paramodulations : 247
% 0.12/0.43 % Factorizations : 26
% 0.12/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.12/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 104
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of those cached : 90
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.12/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.12/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.12/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 29
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 108
% 0.12/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 476
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 669
% 0.12/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 501
% 0.12/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 45
% 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4223
% 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 304
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------