↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV413+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:07:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  12   ~;   6   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  14   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l49_li3637,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ( less_than(X,W)
        & pair_in_list(U,V,W) )
     => pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,W) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l49_li3637) ).

fof(l49_co,conjecture,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ( less_than(X,W)
        & strictly_less_than(V,X)
        & pair_in_list(U,V,W) )
     => ? [Y] :
          ( less_than(X,Y)
          & pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l49_co) ).

fof(l49_co_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,W,X] :
        ( ( less_than(X,W)
          & strictly_less_than(V,X)
          & pair_in_list(U,V,W) )
       => ? [Y] :
            ( less_than(X,Y)
            & pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l49_co]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ! [Y] :
          ( ~ less_than(X,Y)
          | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,Y) )
      & less_than(X,W)
      & strictly_less_than(V,X)
      & pair_in_list(U,V,W) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l49_co_neg]) ).

fof(sk_l49_co_neg,plain,
    ( ! [Y] :
        ( ~ less_than(sK1,Y)
        | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(sK0,sK1),sK2,Y) )
    & less_than(sK1,sK3)
    & strictly_less_than(sK2,sK1)
    & pair_in_list(sK0,sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK2,sK3,sK1]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK2),skolemize(W,sK3),skolemize(X,sK1)],[nnf_19]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(sK1,A)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(sK0,sK1),sK2,A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l49_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    less_than(sK1,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l49_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(sK0,sK2,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l49_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(update_slb(A,D),B,C)
    | ~ less_than(D,C)
    | ~ pair_in_list(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l49_li3637]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(sK0,sK1),sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(update_slb(A,sK1),B,sK3)
    | ~ pair_in_list(A,B,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(sK0,sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_81]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV413+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:47:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.37  % Process 1940213 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.11/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 13:47:27 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/0.39  % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.15/0.39  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.15/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.15/0.39  % Given clauses 31.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------