↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWV416+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:22:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.31s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  15   ~;  11   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   6 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax56,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( pi_sharp_remove(X1,X2)
    <=> contains_pq(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax56) ).

fof(ax57,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( pi_remove(X1,X2)
    <=> pi_sharp_remove(i(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax57) ).

fof(co3,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( pi_remove(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
     => ( phi(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
       => ( pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)
          & i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co3) ).

fof(main3_li12,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] : i(triple(X1,X3,X4)) = i(triple(X2,X3,X5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main3_li12) ).

fof(main3_li34,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)
     => i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main3_li34) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X330,X331] :
      ( ( ~ pi_sharp_remove(X330,X331)
        | contains_pq(X330,X331) )
      & ( ~ contains_pq(X330,X331)
        | pi_sharp_remove(X330,X331) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax56])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X332,X333] :
      ( ( ~ pi_remove(X332,X333)
        | pi_sharp_remove(i(X332),X333) )
      & ( ~ pi_sharp_remove(i(X332),X333)
        | pi_remove(X332,X333) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax57])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( pi_remove(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
       => ( phi(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
         => ( pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)
            & i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( contains_pq(X1,X2)
    | ~ pi_sharp_remove(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( pi_sharp_remove(i(X1),X2)
    | ~ pi_remove(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( pi_remove(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)
    & phi(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0))
    & ( ~ pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)
      | i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)) != remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( contains_pq(i(X1),X2)
    | ~ pi_remove(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    pi_remove(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,lemma,
    ! [X350,X351,X352,X353,X354] : i(triple(X350,X352,X353)) = i(triple(X351,X352,X354)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[main3_li12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)
    | i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)) != remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,lemma,
    ! [X355,X356,X357,X358] :
      ( ~ contains_pq(i(triple(X355,X356,X357)),X358)
      | i(remove_cpq(triple(X355,X356,X357),X358)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X355,X356,X357)),X358) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[main3_li34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
    i(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = i(triple(X4,X2,X5)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0) != i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_9]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    ( i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)
    | ~ contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    contains_pq(i(triple(X1,esk6_0,X2)),esk8_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWV416+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 05:08:02 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.31/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.31/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/1.73  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------