%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Satallax---3.5 % Problem : SWV427^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Oct 9 03:07:20 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 6.55s 6.59s % Output : Proof 6.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWV427^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.6.0. % 0.08/0.14 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Oct 8 14:05:38 EDT 2025 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 6.55/6.59 % SZS status Theorem % 6.55/6.59 % Mode: mode515 % 6.55/6.59 % Inferences: 5041 % 6.55/6.59 % SZS output start Proof % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_a, type, a : ($i>$o)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_eigen__2, type, eigen__2 : $i). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_s, type, s : ($i>$o)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_eigen__3, type, eigen__3 : $i). % 6.55/6.59 thf(ty_rel, type, rel : ($i>$i>$o)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> ((rel @ eigen__2) @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> ((~((a @ eigen__2))) => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((a @ X2))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (s @ X3))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (sP1 => (s @ eigen__3)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2) => sP2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (a @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (s @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> (![X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))) => (X1 @ X2)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => (s @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> ((~(sP7)) => sP10),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP12,plain,sP12 <=> ((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP13,plain,sP13 <=> (![X1:$i]:((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((a @ X2))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (s @ X3)))))) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(sP14,plain,sP14 <=> (sP5 => sP11),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mfalse,definition,(mfalse = (^[X1:$i]:$false))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mtrue,definition,(mtrue = (^[X1:$i]:(~($false))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mnot,definition,(mnot = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mor,definition,(mor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((~((X1 @ X3))) => (X2 @ X3))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mand,definition,(mand = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~(((X1 @ X3) => (~((X2 @ X3))))))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mimpl,definition,(mimpl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X1))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_miff,definition,(miff = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mand @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((mimpl @ X2) @ X1)))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mbox,definition,(mbox = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (X2 @ X4)))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mdia,definition,(mdia = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (~((X2 @ X4)))))))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mall,definition,(mall = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:individuals]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mexists,definition,(mexists = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((![X3:individuals]:(~(((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mvalid,definition,(mvalid = (!!))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_msatisfiable,definition,(msatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_mcountersatisfiable,definition,(mcountersatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((!!) @ X1)))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_minvalid,definition,(minvalid = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_atom,definition,(icl_atom = (mbox @ rel))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_princ,definition,(icl_princ = (^[X1:$i>$o]:X1))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_and,definition,(icl_and = mand)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_or,definition,(icl_or = mor)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_impl,definition,(icl_impl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_true,definition,(icl_true = mtrue)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_false,definition,(icl_false = mfalse)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_icl_says,definition,(icl_says = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mor @ X1) @ X2)))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(def_iclval,definition,(iclval = mvalid)). % 6.55/6.59 thf(idem,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((a @ X4))) => (![X5:$i]:(((rel @ X4) @ X5) => (s @ X5))))))))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => (s @ X4))))))))))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((a @ X4))) => (![X5:$i]:(((rel @ X4) @ X5) => (s @ X5))))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => (s @ X4)))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[idem])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h1,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__0) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((a @ X2))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => (s @ X4))))))))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((a @ X2))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (s @ X3))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h2,assumption,(~((((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1) => (sP3 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2)))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h3,assumption,((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h4,assumption,(~((sP3 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h5,assumption,sP3,introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h6,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((~((a @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (s @ X2)))))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h7,assumption,(~((sP12 => sP11))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h8,assumption,sP12,introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h9,assumption,(~(sP11)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h10,assumption,(~(sP7)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h11,assumption,(~(sP10)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h12,assumption,(~(sP4)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h13,assumption,sP1,introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(h14,assumption,(~(sP8)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(1,plain,(~(sP13) | sP14),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(2,plain,((~(sP14) | ~(sP5)) | sP11),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(3,plain,(~(sP9) | sP13),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(4,plain,(~(sP10) | sP4),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(5,plain,((~(sP4) | ~(sP1)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(6,plain,((~(sP11) | sP7) | sP10),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(7,plain,(~(sP3) | sP6),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(8,plain,((~(sP6) | ~(sP12)) | sP2),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(9,plain,((~(sP2) | sP7) | sP5),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(refl_axiom,axiom,(![X1:$i>$o]:(mvalid @ ((mimpl @ ((mbox @ rel) @ X1)) @ X1)))). % 6.55/6.59 thf(10,plain,sP9,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[refl_axiom]). % 6.55/6.59 thf(11,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h13,h14,h12,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,h5,h8,h10,h13,h14])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(12,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h13,h14])],[h12,11,h13,h14])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(13,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h12]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__3)],[h11,12,h12])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(14,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h9,13,h10,h11])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(15,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,14,h8,h9])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(16,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,15,h7])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(17,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,16,h5,h6])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(18,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h3,h4])],[h2,17,h3,h4])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(19,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h2]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h1,18,h2])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(20,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,19,h1])). % 6.55/6.59 thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((a @ X4))) => (![X5:$i]:(((rel @ X4) @ X5) => (s @ X5))))))))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((a @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => (s @ X4)))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[20,h0])). % 6.55/6.59 % SZS output end Proof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------