%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SWV430^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n018.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 16:47:42 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.40s % Output : FiniteModel 24.40s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV430^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n018.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 07:54:18 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 24.40/17.03 Nitpicking formula... % 24.40/17.03 Timestamp: 07:54:27 % 24.40/17.03 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 24.40/17.03 able to skip some scopes % 24.40/17.03 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 24.40/17.03 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 24.40/17.03 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 24.40/17.03 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 24.40/17.03 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 24.40/17.03 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 24.40/17.03 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 24.40/17.03 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 24.40/17.03 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 24.40/17.03 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 24.40/17.03 % 24.40/17.03 Skolem constants: % 24.40/17.03 ??.bnd_mbox.Y = i1 % 24.40/17.03 ??.bnd_mbox.Y = i2 % 24.40/17.03 ??.bnd_mbox.Y = i1 % 24.40/17.03 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i2 % 24.40/17.03 Constants: % 24.40/17.03 bnd_a = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 24.40/17.03 bnd_b = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True) % 24.40/17.03 bnd_c = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True) % 24.40/17.03 bnd_rel = % 24.40/17.03 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.40/17.03 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True), % 24.40/17.03 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 24.40/17.04 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 24.40/17.04 Total time: 5.2 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------