↑ Up

Satallax---3.5.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SWV430^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 03:07:21 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV430^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  8 14:14:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.39  % Mode: mode213
% 0.13/0.39  % Inferences: 35
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_a, type, a : ($i>$o)).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_eigen__2, type, eigen__2 : $i).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_b, type, b : ($i>$o)).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_eigen__3, type, eigen__3 : $i).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_rel, type, rel : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(ty_c, type, c : ($i>$o)).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> (a @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> ((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))) => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> (b @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2) => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])).
% 0.13/0.39  thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> ((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> (sP3 => (c @ eigen__3)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (![X1:$i]:((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((a @ X3) => (b @ X3)))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> ((rel @ eigen__2) @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP12,plain,sP12 <=> (c @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP13,plain,sP13 <=> (sP11 => (sP1 => sP3)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP14,plain,sP14 <=> (![X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => (X1 @ X4)))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP15,plain,sP15 <=> (sP11 => sP9),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP16,plain,sP16 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((b @ X1) => (c @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP16])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(sP17,plain,sP17 <=> (sP1 => sP3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP17])])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mfalse,definition,(mfalse = (^[X1:$i]:$false))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mtrue,definition,(mtrue = (^[X1:$i]:(~($false))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mnot,definition,(mnot = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mor,definition,(mor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((~((X1 @ X3))) => (X2 @ X3))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mand,definition,(mand = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~(((X1 @ X3) => (~((X2 @ X3))))))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mimpl,definition,(mimpl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X1))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_miff,definition,(miff = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mand @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((mimpl @ X2) @ X1)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mbox,definition,(mbox = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (X2 @ X4)))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mdia,definition,(mdia = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (~((X2 @ X4)))))))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mall,definition,(mall = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:individuals]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mexists,definition,(mexists = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((![X3:individuals]:(~(((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mvalid,definition,(mvalid = (!!))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_msatisfiable,definition,(msatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_mcountersatisfiable,definition,(mcountersatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((!!) @ X1)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_minvalid,definition,(minvalid = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_atom,definition,(icl_atom = (mbox @ rel))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_princ,definition,(icl_princ = (^[X1:$i>$o]:X1))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_and,definition,(icl_and = mand)).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_or,definition,(icl_or = mor)).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_impl,definition,(icl_impl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_true,definition,(icl_true = mtrue)).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_false,definition,(icl_false = mfalse)).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_says,definition,(icl_says = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mor @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_iclval,definition,(iclval = mvalid)).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(def_icl_impl_princ,definition,(icl_impl_princ = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(trans,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((a @ X3))))) => (b @ X3)))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((b @ X4))))) => (c @ X4)))))))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((a @ X4))))) => (c @ X4)))))))))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((a @ X3) => (b @ X3)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((b @ X4) => (c @ X4)))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((a @ X4) => (c @ X4))))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[trans])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h1,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__0) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((b @ X3) => (c @ X3)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((a @ X3) => (c @ X3)))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h2,assumption,(~((((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1) => (sP7 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((b @ X2) => (c @ X2)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (c @ X2))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h3,assumption,((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h4,assumption,(~((sP7 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((b @ X2) => (c @ X2)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (c @ X2)))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h5,assumption,sP7,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h6,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((b @ X2) => (c @ X2)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (c @ X2))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h7,assumption,(~((sP5 => (sP16 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (c @ X1)))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h8,assumption,sP5,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h9,assumption,(~((sP16 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (c @ X1))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h10,assumption,sP16,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h11,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (c @ X1)))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h12,assumption,(~((sP11 => (sP1 => sP12)))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h13,assumption,sP11,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h14,assumption,(~((sP1 => sP12))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h15,assumption,sP1,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(h16,assumption,(~(sP12)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(1,plain,(~(sP8) | sP13),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(2,plain,((~(sP13) | ~(sP11)) | sP17),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(3,plain,(~(sP6) | sP4),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(4,plain,((~(sP4) | ~(sP5)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(5,plain,(~(sP14) | sP10),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(6,plain,(~(sP10) | sP2),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(7,plain,((~(sP2) | ~(sP7)) | sP6),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(8,plain,((~(sP17) | ~(sP1)) | sP3),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(9,plain,(~(sP16) | sP15),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(10,plain,((~(sP15) | ~(sP11)) | sP9),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(11,plain,((~(sP9) | ~(sP3)) | sP12),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(trans_axiom,axiom,(![X1:$i>$o]:(mvalid @ ((mimpl @ ((mbox @ rel) @ X1)) @ ((mbox @ rel) @ ((mbox @ rel) @ X1)))))).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(12,plain,sP14,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[trans_axiom]).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(13,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h15,h16,h13,h14,h12,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,h5,h8,h10,h13,h15,h16])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(14,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h13,h14,h12,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h15,h16])],[h14,13,h15,h16])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(15,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h13,h14])],[h12,14,h13,h14])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(16,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h12]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__3)],[h11,15,h12])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(17,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h9,16,h10,h11])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(18,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,17,h8,h9])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(19,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,18,h7])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(20,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,19,h5,h6])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(21,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h3,h4])],[h2,20,h3,h4])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(22,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h2]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h1,21,h2])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(23,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,22,h1])).
% 0.20/0.39  thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((a @ X3))))) => (b @ X3)))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((b @ X4))))) => (c @ X4)))))))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((a @ X4))))) => (c @ X4))))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[23,h0])).
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------