↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV435^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:39:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.55s 2.19s
% Output   : Refutation 3.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV435^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.20  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:09:35 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.77  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (241ms). 
% 1.54/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.11/1.41  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.11/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.26/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.26/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.44/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.44/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.44/1.61  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.55/2.18  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.55/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.55/2.18  % Time passed: 1850ms (effective reasoning time: 1148ms)
% 3.55/2.18  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.55/2.18  % Axioms used in derivation (3): refl_axiom, trans_axiom, ax1
% 3.55/2.18  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.55/2.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1850 ms resp. 1148 ms w/o parsing
% 3.76/2.24  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/2.24  thf(individuals_type, type, individuals: $tType).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mfalse_decl, type, mfalse: ($i > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mtrue_decl, type, mtrue: ($i > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mimpl_decl, type, mimpl: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mbox_decl, type, mbox: (($i > ($i > $o)) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(rel_decl, type, rel: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_princ_decl, type, icl_princ: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_true_decl, type, icl_true: ($i > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_false_decl, type, icl_false: ($i > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_says_decl, type, icl_says: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(iclval_decl, type, iclval: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(a_decl, type, a: ($i > $o)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mfalse_def, definition, mfalse = (^ [A:$i]: (($false))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mtrue_def, definition, mtrue = (^ [A:$i]: (($true))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mimpl_def, definition, mimpl = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mbox_def, definition, mbox = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o)),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (B @ D))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_princ_def, definition, icl_princ = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (A)) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_true_def, definition, icl_true = (mtrue) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_false_def, definition, icl_false = (mfalse) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(icl_says_def, definition, icl_says = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mbox @ rel @ (mor @ A @ B))) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(iclval_def, definition, iclval = (mvalid) ).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(1,conjecture,((iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ a) @ icl_false))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',untrust)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ a) @ icl_false)))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(6,plain,((~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((rel @ A @ B) => (a @ B))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(3,axiom,((! [A:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ rel @ A) @ A)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl_axiom)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(10,plain,((! [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: (~ (! [C:$i]: ((rel @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) | (A @ B)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(4,axiom,((! [A:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ rel @ A) @ (mbox @ rel @ (mbox @ rel @ A)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_axiom)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(16,plain,((! [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: (~ (! [C:$i]: ((rel @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((rel @ B @ C) => (! [D:$i]: ((rel @ C @ D) => (A @ D))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(5,axiom,(((icl_princ @ a) = icl_true)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(22,plain,(((a) = (^ [A:$i]: (($true))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 3.76/2.24  thf(25,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,10,16,22])).
% 3.76/2.24  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/2.24  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------