%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SWV452+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:21:14 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.29s 0.59s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.29s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV452+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 14:36:29 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 121 Number of unprocessed: 115 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.38 # 115 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 21 conjectures. % 0.13/0.38 # There are 21 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.38 # Found 57 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.38 # 21 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.38 # 58 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.38 # 57 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 1.29/0.59 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 1.29/0.59 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.29/0.59 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.29/0.59 # Begin clausification derivation % 1.29/0.59 % 1.29/0.59 # End clausification derivation % 1.29/0.59 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_109, negated_conjecture, (host(esk6_0)=host(esk7_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_107, negated_conjecture, (host(esk9_0)=host(esk7_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (host(esk10_0)=host(esk7_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (ordered(q_nil))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (host(esk12_0)=host(esk11_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_117, negated_conjecture, (setIn(esk7_0,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (elem(m_Down(esk12_0),esk5_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_118, negated_conjecture, (epred1_3(esk5_0,esk7_0,esk8_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (pidMsg(m_Halt(X1))=X1)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (leq(X1,X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (elem(m_Down(esk10_0),queue(host(esk11_0))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (pidMsg(m_Down(X1))=X1)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (leq(s(zero),nbr_proc))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (leq(host(X1),nbr_proc))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(s(zero),host(X1)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (pidElem(m_Halt(X1)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (pidElem(m_Down(X1)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,q_nil)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (snoc(q_nil,X1)=cons(X1,q_nil))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (head(cons(X1,X2))=X1)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (tail(cons(X1,X2))=X2)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (last(snoc(X1,X2))=X2)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (init(snoc(X1,X2))=X1)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (elem(X1,cons(X1,X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (elem(X1,snoc(X2,X1)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (snoc(cons(X1,X2),X3)=cons(X1,snoc(X2,X3)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (norm!=wait)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_106, negated_conjecture, (host(esk11_0)!=host(esk7_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (elec_1!=elec_2)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (elec_1!=wait)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (elec_2!=wait)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (elec_1!=norm)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (elec_2!=norm)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_108, negated_conjecture, (host(esk7_0)!=s(zero))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (~setIn(esk6_0,pids))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~elem(X1,q_nil))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (~setIn(X1,setEmpty))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~setIn(nil,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (cons(X1,X2)!=q_nil)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_116, negated_conjecture, (~leq(host(esk7_0),host(esk8_0)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (snoc(X1,X2)!=q_nil)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (~leq(s(X1),X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (m_Down(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_Down(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Down(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Down(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Ldr(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Halt(X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Down(X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_NotNorm(X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Ldr(X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_NormQ(X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_105, negated_conjecture, (esk9_0=esk6_0|esk9_0!=esk7_0)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_103, negated_conjecture, (esk11_0=esk6_0|esk11_0!=esk7_0)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (esk9_0=esk6_0|setIn(esk9_0,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_102, negated_conjecture, (esk11_0=esk6_0|setIn(esk11_0,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_113, negated_conjecture, (index(status,host(esk7_0))=norm|index(status,host(esk7_0))=wait)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_115, negated_conjecture, (index(ldr,host(esk7_0))=host(esk8_0)|index(status,host(esk7_0))=wait)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_112, negated_conjecture, (host(index(elid,host(esk7_0)))=host(esk8_0)|index(status,host(esk7_0))=norm)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_114, negated_conjecture, (host(index(elid,host(esk7_0)))=host(esk8_0)|index(ldr,host(esk7_0))=host(esk8_0))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_111, negated_conjecture, (leq(X1,esk6_0)|host(esk7_0)!=host(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (s(host(X1))!=host(X2)|host(X1)!=host(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|m_Down(X1)!=m_Down(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(s(X1),s(X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (ordered(X1)|~ordered(cons(X2,X1)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (leq(X1,s(X2))|~leq(X1,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (leq(s(X1),s(X2))|~leq(X1,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (setIn(X1,pids)|~elem(m_Ack(X2,X1),queue(host(X2))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (X1=X2|m_Halt(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (ordered(X1)|~ordered(snoc(X1,X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X1=X2|m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Ldr(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|m_NormQ(X1)!=m_NormQ(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (setIn(X1,pids)|~elem(m_Ack(X1,X2),queue(host(X1))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_89, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_126, plain, (~epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|~setIn(X4,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X5))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ack(X3,X1)!=m_Ack(X4,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ack(X1,X3)!=m_Ack(X2,X4))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|leq(X2,X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (X1=s(X2)|leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,s(X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_125, plain, (host(X1)!=host(X2)|~epred1_3(X3,X4,X5)|~elem(m_Down(X1),queue(host(X2))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (elem(X1,cons(X2,X3))|~elem(X1,X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (elem(X1,snoc(X2,X3))|~elem(X1,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,m_Ldr(X2)))|~ordered(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_124, plain, (~epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(host(X4),host(X5))|~elem(m_Halt(X5),queue(host(X4))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (X1=X2|elem(X1,X3)|~elem(X1,snoc(X3,X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (X1=X2|elem(X1,X3)|~elem(X1,cons(X2,X3)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_121, plain, (X1=X2|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~epred1_3(X3,X4,X5)|~setIn(X2,alive)|~setIn(X1,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (cons(head(X1),tail(X1))=X1|X1=q_nil)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (snoc(init(X1),last(X1))=X1|X1=q_nil)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|pidElem(X1)|~ordered(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|pidElem(X2)|~ordered(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,m_Ack(X2,X3)))|~ordered(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2)|~leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(esk3_2(X1,X2))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (m_Down(esk2_1(X1))=X1|m_Halt(esk1_1(X1))=X1|~pidElem(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_123, plain, (~epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(host(X4),host(X5))|~elem(m_Ack(X5,X4),queue(host(X6))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_119, plain, (queue(host(X1))=cons(m_Down(X2),X3)|~epred1_3(X3,X1,X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_122, plain, (setIn(X1,alive)|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~epred1_3(X3,X4,X5)|~leq(X2,X1)|~setIn(X2,alive))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|pidElem(esk3_2(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|pidElem(esk4_2(X2,X1))|~ordered(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|~ordered(X1)|~leq(pidMsg(esk4_2(X2,X1)),pidMsg(X2)))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|elem(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|~ordered(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|elem(esk4_2(X2,X1),X1)|~ordered(X1))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~ordered(cons(m_Halt(X1),X3))|~elem(m_Down(X2),X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (host(pidMsg(esk3_2(X1,X2)))=host(pidMsg(X1))|ordered(cons(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (host(pidMsg(esk4_2(X1,X2)))=host(pidMsg(X1))|ordered(snoc(X2,X1))|~ordered(X2))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (host(X1)=host(X2)|host(X2)!=host(X3)|host(X1)!=host(X4)|~epred1_3(X5,X6,X7)|~setIn(X2,alive)|~setIn(X1,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X2)))|~elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X1))))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(X2))|host(pidMsg(X2))!=host(pidMsg(X1))|~ordered(cons(X1,X3))|~pidElem(X1)|~pidElem(X2)|~elem(X2,X3))). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(X2))|host(pidMsg(X1))!=host(pidMsg(X2))|~ordered(snoc(X3,X2))|~pidElem(X2)|~pidElem(X1)|~elem(X1,X3))). % 1.29/0.59 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 1.29/0.59 # Begin printing tableau % 1.29/0.59 # Found 4 steps % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (elem(m_Down(esk12_0),esk5_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (elem(m_Down(esk12_0),esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_53])). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_370, plain, (elem(m_Down(esk12_0),cons(X8,esk5_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_56])). % 1.29/0.59 cnf(i_0_419, plain, (elem(m_Down(esk12_0),snoc(cons(X8,esk5_0),X7))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_419, ...])). % 1.29/0.59 # End printing tableau % 1.29/0.59 # SZS output end % 1.29/0.59 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 1.29/0.59 # Child (22030) has found a proof. % 1.29/0.59 % 1.29/0.59 # Proof search is over... % 1.29/0.59 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------