%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : SWV479+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:51:42 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 120.60s 75.29s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV479+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:41:21 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.56 ____ _ % 0.18/0.56 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.18/0.56 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.18/0.56 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.18/0.56 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.18/0.56 % 0.18/0.56 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.18/0.57 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.18/0.57 % 0.18/0.57 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.18/0.57 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.18/0.57 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.18/0.57 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.18/0.57 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.18/0.57 % 0.18/0.57 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.18/0.57 % 0.18/0.57 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.65/0.61 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 1.92/1.01 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 4.04/1.48 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.18/1.51 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.89/5.91 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 19.37/6.03 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 20.20/6.24 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 26.50/7.70 Prover 1: gave up % 26.50/7.70 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 26.50/7.74 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 29.05/8.38 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 29.47/8.40 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 33.27/9.34 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 33.60/9.42 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 33.60/9.50 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 34.00/9.50 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 42.93/12.56 Prover 3: gave up % 42.93/12.56 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete % 43.31/12.60 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 44.70/12.95 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 44.70/12.96 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 47.87/14.16 Prover 0: stopped % 48.36/14.36 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 48.77/14.43 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 49.44/14.62 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 63.38/26.96 Prover 5: stopped % 63.65/27.16 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 63.81/27.22 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 64.97/27.52 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 64.97/27.53 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 120.60/75.29 Prover 6: proved (45510ms) % 120.60/75.29 Prover 4: stopped % 120.60/75.29 Prover 2: stopped % 120.60/75.29 % 120.60/75.29 No countermodel exists, formula is valid % 120.60/75.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 120.60/75.29 % 120.60/75.29 Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers %------------------------------------------------------------------------------