↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV487+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:02:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.46s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  169 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  184 (  62   ~;  64   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   0 sgn  51   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ut,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( int_leq(X1,n)
        & int_less(X2,X1)
        & int_leq(int_one,X2) )
     => a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ut) ).

fof(int_leq,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( int_leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2
        | int_less(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_leq) ).

fof(plus_and_inverse,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( int_less(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( int_less(int_zero,X3)
          & plus(X1,X3) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_and_inverse) ).

fof(int_less_transitive,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( int_less(X2,X3)
        & int_less(X1,X2) )
     => int_less(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_less_transitive) ).

fof(one_successor_of_zero,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( int_less(int_zero,X1)
    <=> int_leq(int_one,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one_successor_of_zero) ).

fof(qiu,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( int_leq(X2,n)
        & int_leq(int_one,X2)
        & int_leq(X1,n)
        & int_leq(int_one,X1) )
     => ( ! [X8] :
            ( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
              & int_leq(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = lu(X3,plus(X3,X8)) ) )
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
              & int_less(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qiu) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( epred1_2(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ! [X8] :
            ( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
              & int_leq(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = lu(X3,plus(X3,X8)) ) )
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
              & int_less(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( epred1_2(X1,X2)
     => ( ! [X8] :
            ( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
              & int_leq(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = lu(X3,plus(X3,X8)) ) )
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
              & int_less(int_zero,X8) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
                  & int_leq(int_one,X3) )
               => a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( int_leq(X1,n)
          & int_less(X2,X1)
          & int_leq(int_one,X2) )
       => a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[ut]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41] :
      ( ( ~ epred1_2(X37,X36)
        | a(X41,plus(X41,X40)) = lu(X41,plus(X41,X40))
        | ~ int_leq(X41,X37)
        | ~ int_leq(int_one,X41)
        | X36 != plus(X37,X40)
        | ~ int_leq(int_zero,X40) )
      & ( ~ epred1_2(X37,X36)
        | a(plus(X39,X38),X39) = real_zero
        | ~ int_leq(X39,X36)
        | ~ int_leq(int_one,X39)
        | X37 != plus(X36,X38)
        | ~ int_less(int_zero,X38) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ( int_leq(X9,X10)
        | X9 != X10 )
      & ( int_leq(X9,X10)
        | ~ int_less(X9,X10) )
      & ( X9 = X10
        | int_less(X9,X10)
        | ~ int_leq(X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[int_leq])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_zero
    & int_leq(esk2_0,n)
    & int_less(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & int_leq(int_one,esk3_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ int_leq(X4,X3)
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,X4)
    | X2 != plus(X3,X1)
    | ~ int_less(int_zero,X1)
    | a(plus(X4,X1),X4) = real_zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ( int_less(X28,X29)
        | ~ int_less(int_zero,X30)
        | plus(X28,X30) != X29 )
      & ( ~ int_less(X25,X26)
        | int_less(int_zero,esk1_2(X25,X26)) )
      & ( ~ int_less(X25,X26)
        | plus(X25,esk1_2(X25,X26)) = X26 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[plus_and_inverse])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X13] :
      ( int_less(X11,X13)
      | ~ int_less(X12,X13)
      | ~ int_less(X11,X12) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[int_less_transitive])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | int_less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    int_leq(esk2_0,n),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ int_leq(X1,X3)
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
    | ~ int_less(int_zero,X2)
    | ~ epred1_2(plus(X3,X2),X3)
    | a(plus(X1,X2),X1) = real_zero ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ int_less(X1,X2)
    | plus(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ int_less(X1,X2)
    | int_less(int_zero,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | int_leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X31] :
      ( ( int_less(int_zero,X31)
        | ~ int_leq(int_one,X31) )
      & ( int_leq(int_one,X31)
        | ~ int_less(int_zero,X31) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[one_successor_of_zero])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ int_less(X2,X3)
    | ~ int_less(X1,X2)
    | int_less(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    int_less(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( int_less(esk2_0,n)
    | n = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
    | ~ int_less(X2,X3)
    | ~ epred1_2(X3,X2)
    | a(plus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X3)),X1) = real_zero ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    int_leq(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( int_leq(X2,n)
        & int_leq(int_one,X2)
        & int_leq(X1,n)
        & int_leq(int_one,X1) )
     => epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[qiu,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ int_less(int_zero,X1)
    | int_leq(int_one,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ int_less(X1,esk3_0)
    | int_less(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ int_less(X1,esk2_0)
    | int_less(X1,n)
    | n = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
    | ~ int_less(X2,X1)
    | ~ epred1_2(X1,X2)
    | a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    int_leq(int_one,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( epred1_2(X32,X33)
      | ~ int_leq(X33,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,X33)
      | ~ int_leq(X32,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,X32) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ int_less(int_zero,esk3_0)
    | int_leq(int_one,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
    | int_less(int_zero,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ int_less(X1,X2)
    | int_leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( int_less(esk3_0,n)
    | n = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred1_2(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    ( ~ int_leq(X2,n)
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
    | ~ int_leq(X1,n)
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
    | epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    int_leq(int_one,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( int_leq(esk3_0,n)
    | n = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    ~ int_leq(esk3_0,n),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_16]),c_0_33]),c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    n = esk2_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    int_leq(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV487+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:57:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/0.62  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.46/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.46/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2928229 completed with status 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.46/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.46/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.46/0.62  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.46/0.62  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 1.46/0.62  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2928234 completed with status 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.46/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.46/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.46/0.62  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.46/0.62  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 1.46/0.62  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.46/0.62  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.46/0.62  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.46/0.62  
% 1.46/0.62  % Proof found!
% 1.46/0.62  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.46/0.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.46/0.62  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 1.46/0.62  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Initial clauses                      : 23
% 1.46/0.62  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 1.46/0.62  % Processed clauses                    : 3123
% 1.46/0.62  % ...of these trivial                  : 12
% 1.46/0.62  % ...subsumed                          : 2311
% 1.46/0.62  % ...remaining for further processing  : 800
% 1.46/0.62  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 1.46/0.62  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Backward-subsumed                    : 110
% 1.46/0.62  % Backward-rewritten                   : 201
% 1.46/0.62  % Generated clauses                    : 21514
% 1.46/0.62  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16805
% 1.46/0.62  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 1.46/0.62  % Paramodulations                      : 21506
% 1.46/0.62  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 1.46/0.62  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 1.46/0.62  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7809
% 1.46/0.62  % ...of those cached                   : 7771
% 1.46/0.62  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.46/0.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 460
% 1.46/0.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 1.46/0.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.46/0.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 1.46/0.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 437
% 1.46/0.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13567
% 1.46/0.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 59906
% 1.46/0.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 335
% 1.46/0.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35837
% 1.46/0.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18676
% 1.46/0.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2026
% 1.46/0.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 771
% 1.46/0.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 1.46/0.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 1.46/0.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.46/0.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 267887
% 1.46/0.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 354
% 1.46/0.62  
% 1.46/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.46/0.62  % User time                : 0.183 s
% 1.46/0.62  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 1.46/0.62  % Total time               : 0.195 s
% 1.46/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 3388 pages
% 1.46/0.62  
% 1.46/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.46/0.62  % User time                : 0.851 s
% 1.46/0.62  % System time              : 0.051 s
% 1.46/0.62  % Total time               : 0.902 s
% 1.46/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.46/0.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------