%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV491+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:55:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 63.47s 9.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 63.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 62 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 257 ( 81 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 305 ( 110 ~; 110 |; 54 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 28 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 136 ( 2 sgn 67 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(plus_and_order1,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( int_leq(X6,X7)
& int_less(X4,X5) )
=> int_leq(plus(X4,X6),plus(X5,X7)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_and_order1) ).
fof(plus_commutative,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : plus(X1,X2) = plus(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_commutative) ).
fof(plus_and_inverse,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( int_less(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( int_less(int_zero,X3)
& plus(X1,X3) = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_and_inverse) ).
fof(int_leq,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( int_leq(X1,X2)
<=> ( X1 = X2
| int_less(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_leq) ).
fof(plus_zero,axiom,
! [X1] : plus(X1,int_zero) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_zero) ).
fof(id,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(X2,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X1) )
=> ( ( X1 = X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_one )
& ( X1 != X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_zero ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',id) ).
fof(qii,hypothesis,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(X2,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X1) )
=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qii) ).
fof(int_less_total,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( int_leq(X2,X1)
| int_less(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_less_total) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( epred1_2(X1,X2)
<=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( epred1_2(X1,X2)
=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( X2 = plus(X1,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X1)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( X1 = plus(X2,X8)
& int_less(int_zero,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(X3,X2)
& int_leq(int_one,X3) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42] :
( ( ~ epred1_2(X37,X36)
| a(X42,plus(X42,X41)) = real_zero
| ~ int_leq(X42,X37)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X42)
| X36 != plus(X37,X41)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X41) )
& ( ~ epred1_2(X37,X36)
| a(X40,X40) = real_one
| ~ int_leq(X40,X36)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X40) )
& ( ~ epred1_2(X37,X36)
| a(plus(X39,X38),X39) = real_zero
| ~ int_leq(X39,X36)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X39)
| X37 != plus(X36,X38)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X38) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23,X24] :
( int_leq(plus(X21,X23),plus(X22,X24))
| ~ int_leq(X23,X24)
| ~ int_less(X21,X22) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[plus_and_order1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X18,X19] : plus(X18,X19) = plus(X19,X18),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[plus_commutative]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ epred1_2(X3,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X4,X3)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X4)
| X2 != plus(X3,X1)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X1)
| a(X4,plus(X4,X1)) = real_zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X25,X26,X28,X29,X30] :
( ( int_less(X28,X29)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X30)
| plus(X28,X30) != X29 )
& ( ~ int_less(X25,X26)
| int_less(int_zero,esk1_2(X25,X26)) )
& ( ~ int_less(X25,X26)
| plus(X25,esk1_2(X25,X26)) = X26 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[plus_and_inverse])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( int_leq(X9,X10)
| X9 != X10 )
& ( int_leq(X9,X10)
| ~ int_less(X9,X10) )
& ( X9 = X10
| int_less(X9,X10)
| ~ int_leq(X9,X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[int_leq])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X3,X4)
| ~ int_less(X1,X2)
| int_leq(plus(X1,X3),plus(X2,X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
plus(X1,X2) = plus(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X20] : plus(X20,int_zero) = X20,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[plus_zero]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(X2,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X1) )
=> ( ( X1 = X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_one )
& ( X1 != X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_zero ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[id]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X3)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X2)
| ~ epred1_2(X3,plus(X3,X2))
| a(X1,plus(X1,X2)) = real_zero ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ int_less(X1,X2)
| plus(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ int_less(X1,X2)
| int_less(int_zero,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 != X2
| int_leq(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_24,hypothesis,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(X2,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X1) )
=> epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[qii,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X2,X3)
| ~ int_less(X1,X4)
| int_leq(plus(X1,X2),plus(X3,X4)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
plus(X1,int_zero) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(X2,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X1) )
=> ( ( X1 = X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_one )
& ( X1 != X2
=> a(X1,X2) = real_zero ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(X2,X3)
| ~ epred1_2(X2,X3)
| a(X1,plus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X3))) = real_zero ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
int_leq(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_30,hypothesis,
! [X32,X33] :
( epred1_2(X32,X33)
| ~ int_leq(X33,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X33)
| ~ int_leq(X32,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X2,X4)
| ~ int_less(X4,X3)
| ~ int_less(X1,esk1_2(X4,X3))
| int_leq(plus(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
plus(int_zero,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ epred1_2(X2,X3)
| ~ int_leq(X4,X3)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X4)
| X2 != plus(X3,X1)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X1)
| a(plus(X4,X1),X4) = real_zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ( a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_zero
| a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_one )
& ( a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_zero
| esk2_0 = esk3_0 )
& ( esk2_0 != esk3_0
| a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_one )
& ( esk2_0 != esk3_0
| esk2_0 = esk3_0 )
& int_leq(esk3_0,n)
& int_leq(int_one,esk3_0)
& int_leq(esk2_0,n)
& int_leq(int_one,esk2_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(X1,X2)
| ~ epred1_2(X1,X2)
| a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_21]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
( ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X3)
| ~ int_less(X3,X2)
| int_leq(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_22]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X3)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(int_zero,X2)
| ~ epred1_2(plus(X3,X2),X3)
| a(plus(X1,X2),X1) = real_zero ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_zero
| esk2_0 = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
( ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(X1,X2)
| a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(int_one,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(esk3_0,n),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(esk2_0,n),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
fof(c_0_44,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( int_leq(X17,X16)
| int_less(X16,X17) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[int_less_total]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ epred1_2(X3,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| a(X1,X1) = real_one ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_less(X2,X3)
| ~ epred1_2(X3,X2)
| a(plus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X3)),X1) = real_zero ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( ~ int_less(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| esk3_0 = esk2_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( int_leq(X2,X1)
| int_less(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
( ~ int_leq(esk2_0,X2)
| ~ epred1_2(X1,X2)
| a(esk2_0,esk2_0) = real_one ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_less(X2,X1)
| ~ epred1_2(X1,X2)
| a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_21]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ int_leq(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| int_less(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( int_leq(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| esk3_0 = esk2_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,hypothesis,
( ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| ~ int_leq(esk2_0,X1)
| a(esk2_0,esk2_0) = real_one ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,hypothesis,
( ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_less(X2,X1)
| a(X1,X2) = real_zero ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(int_one,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
( int_less(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| esk3_0 = esk2_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
( ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| a(esk2_0,esk2_0) = real_one ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_29]),c_0_43]),c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_0 != esk3_0
| a(esk2_0,esk3_0) != real_one ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = esk2_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_54]),c_0_55]),c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
a(esk2_0,esk2_0) = real_one,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_42]),c_0_55])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]),c_0_59])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV491+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:55:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 63.47/9.71 % Version: 3.5.1
% 63.47/9.71 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 63.47/9.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2547863 completed with status 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 63.47/9.71 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 63.47/9.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 63.47/9.71 % No SInE strategy applied
% 63.47/9.71 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 63.47/9.71 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2547869 completed with status 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 63.47/9.71 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 63.47/9.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 63.47/9.71 % No SInE strategy applied
% 63.47/9.71 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 63.47/9.71 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 63.47/9.71 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 63.47/9.71 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 63.47/9.71
% 63.47/9.71 % Proof found!
% 63.47/9.71 % SZS status Theorem
% 63.47/9.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 63.47/9.71 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 63.47/9.71 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Initial clauses : 28
% 63.47/9.71 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 63.47/9.71 % Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 63.47/9.71 % Processed clauses : 25450
% 63.47/9.71 % ...of these trivial : 31
% 63.47/9.71 % ...subsumed : 20872
% 63.47/9.71 % ...remaining for further processing : 4547
% 63.47/9.71 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 63.47/9.71 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Backward-subsumed : 262
% 63.47/9.71 % Backward-rewritten : 1673
% 63.47/9.71 % Generated clauses : 591119
% 63.47/9.71 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 508853
% 63.47/9.71 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 76
% 63.47/9.71 % Paramodulations : 590874
% 63.47/9.71 % Factorizations : 240
% 63.47/9.71 % NegExts : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Equation resolutions : 5
% 63.47/9.71 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Total rewrite steps : 131353
% 63.47/9.71 % ...of those cached : 131255
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional check models : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 63.47/9.71 % Current number of processed clauses : 2580
% 63.47/9.71 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 63.47/9.71 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 63.47/9.71 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 63.47/9.71 % Non-unit-clauses : 2563
% 63.47/9.71 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 480954
% 63.47/9.71 % ...number of literals in the above : 2544742
% 63.47/9.71 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Current number of archived clauses : 1962
% 63.47/9.71 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 997138
% 63.47/9.71 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 354212
% 63.47/9.71 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19486
% 63.47/9.71 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1603
% 63.47/9.71 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % BW rewrite match attempts : 23
% 63.47/9.71 % BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 63.47/9.71 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Condensation successes : 0
% 63.47/9.71 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8336323
% 63.47/9.71 % Search garbage collected termcells : 415
% 63.47/9.71
% 63.47/9.71 % -------------------------------------------------
% 63.47/9.71 % User time : 8.682 s
% 63.47/9.71 % System time : 0.348 s
% 63.47/9.71 % Total time : 9.031 s
% 63.47/9.71 % Maximum resident set size: 3392 pages
% 63.47/9.71
% 63.47/9.71 % -------------------------------------------------
% 63.47/9.71 % User time : 43.425 s
% 63.47/9.71 % System time : 1.726 s
% 63.47/9.71 % Total time : 45.151 s
% 63.47/9.71 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 63.47/9.71 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------