↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:55:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named a2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_4ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2) = select(X3,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    a2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1) != store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19),
    c_0_3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
    a1,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:54:57 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % new_bool_3 with pid 1372795 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  % Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1372798 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  % Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.42  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.15/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.15/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.15/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.15/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3
% 0.15/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.15/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.15/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.15/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 523
% 0.15/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3708 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------