%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV496-1.050 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:55:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.11s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named a2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_4ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2) = select(X3,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
a2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n40,e40),n41,e41),n42,e42),n43,e43),n44,e44),n45,e45),n46,e46),n47,e47),n48,e48),n49,e49),n1,e1) != store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n41,e41),n30,e30),n45,e45),n43,e43),n28,e28),n19,e19),n22,e22),n39,e39),n20,e20),n40,e40),n16,e16),n8,e8),n49,e49),n14,e14),n13,e13),n6,e6),n27,e27),n15,e15),n7,e7),n33,e33),n9,e9),n17,e17),n42,e42),n47,e47),n18,e18),n26,e26),n34,e34),n11,e11),n36,e36),n44,e44),n38,e38),n23,e23),n25,e25),n46,e46),n35,e35),n50,e50),n2,e2),n10,e10),n48,e48),n29,e29),n3,e3),n37,e37),n12,e12),n5,e5),n32,e32),n4,e4),n24,e24),n21,e21),n31,e31),n1,e1),
c_0_3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
a1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV496-1.050 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:56:02 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2549047 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.42 % Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 121s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting H----_011_C18_F1_PI_SE_SP_S2S with 109s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2549052 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.42 % Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 121s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % No proof found!
% 0.11/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.11/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.11/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 653
% 0.11/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.42 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3728 pages
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.42 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------