%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV551-1.004 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:58:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.26s 0.54s
% Output : Saturation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named hyp16ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_21ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
a_29 = a_31,
hyp16,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
a1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
a_29 = store(a_25,i4,e_28),
hyp6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
e_30 = e_28,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
( select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2) = select(X3,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
a2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
store(a_27,i4,e_28) = a_29,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
a_25 = store(a_21,i3,e_24),
hyp4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
( i4 = X1
| select(a_29,X1) = select(a_25,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
( i4 = X1
| select(a_29,X1) = select(a_27,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
a_27 = store(a_23,i3,e_26),
hyp5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
( i3 = X1
| select(a_25,X1) = select(a_21,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
( i4 = X1
| select(a_25,X1) = select(a_27,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
a_21 = store(a_17,i2,e_20),
hyp2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
( i3 = X1
| select(a_27,X1) = select(a_23,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
( i3 = X1
| i4 = X1
| select(a_27,X1) = select(a_21,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
a_23 = store(a_19,i2,e_22),
hyp3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
( i2 = X1
| select(a_21,X1) = select(a_17,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
( i3 = X1
| i4 = X1
| select(a_21,X1) = select(a_23,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
a_17 = store(a1,i1,e_16),
hyp0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
( i2 = X1
| select(a_23,X1) = select(a_19,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
( i2 = X1
| i4 = X1
| i3 = X1
| select(a_23,X1) = select(a_17,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
a_19 = store(a2,i1,e_18),
hyp1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
select(a_25,i4) = e_28,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
e_28 = select(a_27,i4),
hyp14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
( i1 = X1
| select(a_17,X1) = select(a1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_42]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
( i2 = X1
| i3 = X1
| i4 = X1
| select(a_17,X1) = select(a_19,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
select(a_17,i1) = e_16,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_42]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
select(a_19,i1) = e_18,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
select(a_21,i2) = e_20,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,hypothesis,
select(a_23,i2) = e_22,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,hypothesis,
select(a_25,i3) = e_24,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,hypothesis,
select(a_27,i3) = e_26,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,hypothesis,
( i4 = i3
| select(a_21,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
( i4 = i3
| select(a_23,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,hypothesis,
e_26 = select(a_21,i3),
hyp13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,hypothesis,
e_24 = select(a_23,i3),
hyp12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
( i1 = X1
| select(a_19,X1) = select(a2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,hypothesis,
( i1 = X1
| i4 = X1
| i3 = X1
| i2 = X1
| select(a_19,X1) = select(a1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,hypothesis,
( e_18 = e_16
| i4 = i1
| i3 = i1
| i2 = i1 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_49]),c_0_51]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,hypothesis,
( e_22 = e_20
| i4 = i2
| i3 = i2 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_40]),c_0_53]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,hypothesis,
( e_26 = e_24
| i4 = i3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_34]),c_0_55]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
( i4 = i3
| i4 = i2
| select(a_17,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,hypothesis,
( i4 = i3
| i4 = i2
| select(a_19,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,hypothesis,
( i3 = i2
| select(a_17,i3) = e_26 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_68,hypothesis,
( i3 = i2
| select(a_19,i3) = e_24 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,hypothesis,
e_22 = select(a_17,i2),
hyp11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,hypothesis,
e_20 = select(a_19,i2),
hyp10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,hypothesis,
( i1 = X1
| i2 = X1
| i3 = X1
| i4 = X1
| select(a1,X1) = select(a2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,hypothesis,
( i2 = i1
| i3 = i1
| i4 = i1
| store(a2,i1,e_16) = a_19 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_62]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,hypothesis,
( i3 = i2
| i4 = i2
| store(a_19,i2,e_20) = a_23 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_63]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,hypothesis,
( i4 = i3
| store(a_23,i3,e_24) = a_27 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_64]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_76,hypothesis,
( i4 = i1
| i4 = i2
| i4 = i3
| select(a1,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_65]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,hypothesis,
( i4 = i1
| i4 = i2
| i4 = i3
| select(a2,i4) = e_28 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_66]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,hypothesis,
( i3 = i1
| i3 = i2
| select(a1,i3) = e_26 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,hypothesis,
( i3 = i1
| i3 = i2
| select(a2,i3) = e_24 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_68]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,hypothesis,
( i2 = i1
| select(a1,i2) = e_22 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_48]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,hypothesis,
( i2 = i1
| select(a2,i2) = e_20 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_60]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
a1 != a2,
c_0_71,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,hypothesis,
select(a_29,i4) = e_28,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,hypothesis,
e_18 = select(a1,i1),
hyp9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,hypothesis,
e_16 = select(a2,i1),
hyp8,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV551-1.004 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:13:14 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2760807 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2760813 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % No proof found!
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.26/0.54 % Processed clauses : 90
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.26/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 84
% 0.26/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.26/0.54 % Generated clauses : 49
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 51
% 0.26/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Paramodulations : 49
% 0.26/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.26/0.55 % ...of those cached : 7
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 0.26/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.26/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.26/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.26/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.26/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.26/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.26/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.26/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 962
% 0.26/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.26/0.55
% 0.26/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.55 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.55 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.55 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3384 pages
% 0.26/0.55
% 0.26/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.55 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.26/0.55 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.26/0.55 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.26/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------