%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV557-1.004 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 5.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 20 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(a1,axiom,
select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).
cnf(hyp0,hypothesis,
store(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,select(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4)) = store(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,select(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hyp0) ).
cnf(a3,axiom,
store(X1,X2,select(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a3) ).
cnf(a4,axiom,
store(store(X1,X2,X3),X2,X4) = store(X1,X2,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a4) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a1 != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
a1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
store(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,select(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4)) = store(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,select(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4)),
hyp0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
select(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4) = select(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
store(X1,X2,select(X1,X2)) = X1,
a3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
store(store(X1,X2,X3),X2,X4) = store(X1,X2,X4),
a4 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
store(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,select(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4)) = store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
store(store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,X1) = store(store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),i4,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
store(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3)) = store(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3,select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
select(store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)),i3) = select(store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),i3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
store(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2,select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2)) = store(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2,select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
select(store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)),i2) = select(store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),i2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_14]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
store(a1,i1,select(a2,i1)) = store(a2,i1,select(a1,i1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_15]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
a1 != a2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
select(a1,i1) = select(a2,i1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_16]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
a1 != a2,
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_18]),c_0_8]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV557-1.004 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/5.47 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/5.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:11:12 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/5.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/5.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/5.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/5.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1908189 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/5.59 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/5.59 % Search class: FGUPS-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.59 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 358s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 354s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G----_407_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AN with 172s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % G----_407_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AN with pid 1908199 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Result found by G----_407_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/5.59 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/5.59 % Search class: FGUPS-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.59 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 358s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 354s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Starting G----_407_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AN with 172s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/5.59 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/5.59
% 0.24/5.59 % Proof found!
% 0.24/5.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/5.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/5.59 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.24/5.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.24/5.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.24/5.59 % Processed clauses : 27
% 0.24/5.59 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/5.59 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.24/5.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.24/5.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.24/5.59 % Generated clauses : 136
% 0.24/5.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 134
% 0.24/5.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Paramodulations : 136
% 0.24/5.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Total rewrite steps : 45
% 0.24/5.59 % ...of those cached : 13
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.24/5.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/5.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/5.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/5.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 119
% 0.24/5.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 232
% 0.24/5.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.24/5.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.24/5.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.24/5.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.24/5.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.24/5.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.24/5.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/5.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10069
% 0.24/5.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.24/5.59
% 0.24/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.59 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/5.59 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/5.59 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3384 pages
% 0.24/5.59
% 0.24/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.59 % User time : 0.090 s
% 0.24/5.59 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/5.59 % Total time : 0.107 s
% 0.24/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/5.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------