↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV592-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 5.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  27 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  32 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_real__diff__def_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__diff__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0) ).

cnf(cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0,axiom,
    X1 = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0) ).

cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi_0,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi_0) ).

cnf(cls_sin__minus_0,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__minus_0) ).

cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_real__diff__def_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    X1 = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_sin__periodic__pi_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_sin__minus_0 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV592-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/5.47  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.19/5.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/5.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/5.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/5.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/5.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/5.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/5.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:15:22 UTC 2026
% 0.19/5.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/5.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/5.54  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/5.54  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/5.62  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % new_bool_3 with pid 2950457 completed with status 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.25/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/5.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/5.62  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.62  % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2950460 completed with status 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/5.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/5.62  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.62  % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/5.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.62  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.25/5.62  
% 0.25/5.62  % Proof found!
% 0.25/5.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/5.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/5.62  % Parsed axioms                        : 924
% 0.25/5.62  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 850
% 0.25/5.62  % Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.25/5.62  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.25/5.62  % Processed clauses                    : 76
% 0.25/5.62  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.25/5.62  % ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.25/5.62  % ...remaining for further processing  : 66
% 0.25/5.62  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.25/5.62  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.25/5.62  % Generated clauses                    : 210
% 0.25/5.62  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 118
% 0.25/5.62  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Paramodulations                      : 200
% 0.25/5.62  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.25/5.62  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.25/5.62  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Total rewrite steps                  : 208
% 0.25/5.62  % ...of those cached                   : 141
% 0.25/5.62  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.25/5.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 50
% 0.25/5.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 34
% 0.25/5.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.25/5.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.25/5.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.25/5.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 105
% 0.25/5.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 180
% 0.25/5.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.25/5.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.25/5.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.25/5.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
% 0.25/5.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.25/5.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/5.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 13856
% 0.25/5.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3062
% 0.25/5.62  
% 0.25/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/5.62  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.25/5.62  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.25/5.62  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.25/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4480 pages
% 0.25/5.62  
% 0.25/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/5.62  % User time                : 0.055 s
% 0.25/5.62  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.25/5.62  % Total time               : 0.069 s
% 0.25/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.25/5.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------