%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 2 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0,axiom,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__less__def_1,axiom,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__less__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_0_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_0_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__less__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.47 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/0.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:12:57 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.72 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.38/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % new_bool_1 with pid 2499247 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.38/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.38/0.72 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.72 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.72 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.72 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2499249 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.38/0.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.38/0.72 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.72 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.72 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.72 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.72 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.38/0.72
% 0.38/0.72 % Proof found!
% 0.38/0.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.72 % Parsed axioms : 1205
% 0.38/0.72 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1049
% 0.38/0.72 % Initial clauses : 156
% 0.38/0.72 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Initial clauses in saturation : 156
% 0.38/0.72 % Processed clauses : 121
% 0.38/0.72 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.38/0.72 % ...subsumed : 32
% 0.38/0.72 % ...remaining for further processing : 79
% 0.38/0.72 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Generated clauses : 269
% 0.38/0.72 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 205
% 0.38/0.72 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Paramodulations : 263
% 0.38/0.72 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.38/0.72 % NegExts : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.38/0.72 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Total rewrite steps : 73
% 0.38/0.72 % ...of those cached : 47
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.72 % Current number of processed clauses : 79
% 0.38/0.72 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 0.38/0.72 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.38/0.72 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.38/0.72 % Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.38/0.72 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 240
% 0.38/0.72 % ...number of literals in the above : 877
% 0.38/0.72 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 81
% 0.38/0.72 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.38/0.72 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.38/0.72 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.38/0.72 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.38/0.72 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.38/0.72 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.38/0.72 % Termbank termtop insertions : 21346
% 0.38/0.72 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3963
% 0.38/0.72
% 0.38/0.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.72 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.38/0.72 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.38/0.72 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.38/0.72 % Maximum resident set size: 4672 pages
% 0.38/0.72
% 0.38/0.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.72 % User time : 0.094 s
% 0.38/0.72 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.38/0.72 % Total time : 0.112 s
% 0.38/0.72 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.38/0.72 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------