%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 2 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0,axiom,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__less__def_1,axiom,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__less__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_0_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_0_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__less__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:12:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 3100371 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3100373 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 1205
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1049
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses : 156
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 156
% 0.13/0.45 % Processed clauses : 121
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.13/0.45 % ...subsumed : 32
% 0.13/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 79
% 0.13/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Generated clauses : 269
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 205
% 0.13/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Paramodulations : 263
% 0.13/0.45 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.13/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.13/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 73
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of those cached : 47
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 79
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 240
% 0.13/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 877
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 81
% 0.13/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.13/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.13/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 21346
% 0.13/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3963
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4724 pages
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.044 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.13/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------