%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.20s 1.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 10 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0,axiom,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi__diff_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi__diff_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__less__def_1,axiom,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__less__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__periodic__pi_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__periodic__pi__diff_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__less__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_9]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_9]),c_0_17])]),c_0_13]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:13:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.20/1.07 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.20/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.20/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with pid 2218666 completed with status 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.20/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.20/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.20/1.07 % SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 4.20/1.07 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 4.20/1.07 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 151s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with pid 2218674 completed with status 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.20/1.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.20/1.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.20/1.07 % SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 4.20/1.07 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 4.20/1.07 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 151s (1) cores
% 4.20/1.07 % Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 4.20/1.07
% 4.20/1.07 % Proof found!
% 4.20/1.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.20/1.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.20/1.07 % Parsed axioms : 1255
% 4.20/1.07 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 198
% 4.20/1.07 % Initial clauses : 1057
% 4.20/1.07 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 4.20/1.07 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1055
% 4.20/1.07 % Processed clauses : 1826
% 4.20/1.07 % ...of these trivial : 186
% 4.20/1.07 % ...subsumed : 418
% 4.20/1.07 % ...remaining for further processing : 1221
% 4.20/1.07 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 4.20/1.07 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 4.20/1.07 % Backward-rewritten : 38
% 4.20/1.07 % Generated clauses : 32338
% 4.20/1.07 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30076
% 4.20/1.07 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Paramodulations : 32302
% 4.20/1.07 % Factorizations : 8
% 4.20/1.07 % NegExts : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Equation resolutions : 28
% 4.20/1.07 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Total rewrite steps : 17627
% 4.20/1.07 % ...of those cached : 16780
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.20/1.07 % Current number of processed clauses : 1180
% 4.20/1.07 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 284
% 4.20/1.07 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 4.20/1.07 % Negative unit clauses : 52
% 4.20/1.07 % Non-unit-clauses : 840
% 4.20/1.07 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29286
% 4.20/1.07 % ...number of literals in the above : 89901
% 4.20/1.07 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 4.20/1.07 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 89250
% 4.20/1.07 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31165
% 4.20/1.07 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 234
% 4.20/1.07 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1990
% 4.20/1.07 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % BW rewrite match attempts : 98
% 4.20/1.07 % BW rewrite match successes : 43
% 4.20/1.07 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.20/1.07 % Termbank termtop insertions : 531897
% 4.20/1.07 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2674
% 4.20/1.07
% 4.20/1.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.20/1.07 % User time : 0.565 s
% 4.20/1.07 % System time : 0.030 s
% 4.20/1.07 % Total time : 0.595 s
% 4.20/1.07 % Maximum resident set size: 6032 pages
% 4.20/1.07
% 4.20/1.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.20/1.07 % User time : 2.765 s
% 4.20/1.07 % System time : 0.155 s
% 4.20/1.07 % Total time : 2.920 s
% 4.20/1.07 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 4.20/1.07 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------