↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV598-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 14.21s 2.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  17 unt;   4 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   56 (  23 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_04,axiom,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_04) ).

cnf(cls_linorder__neqE__ordered__idom_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | X3 = X2
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X3,X2,X1)
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X2,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_linorder__neqE__ordered__idom_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_03,axiom,
    ( v_x != c_Transcendental_Opi
    | c_Transcendental_Ocos(v_x) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_real__mult__commute_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__mult__commute_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_0_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_0_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Ocos(v_x) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0_04]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | X3 = X2
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X3,X2,X1)
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_linorder__neqE__ordered__idom_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( v_x != c_Transcendental_Opi
    | c_Transcendental_Ocos(v_x) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0_03]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_real__mult__commute_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_0_0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | X3 = X2
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X3,X2,X1)
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X2,X3,X1) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( v_x != c_Transcendental_Opi
    | c_Transcendental_Ocos(v_x) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    c_Transcendental_Ocos(v_x) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Transcendental_Opi,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X2,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    v_x != c_Transcendental_Opi,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_15]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV598-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:13:40 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.21/2.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 14.21/2.56  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 14.21/2.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 552366 completed with status 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 14.21/2.56  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 14.21/2.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 14.21/2.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 14.21/2.56  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 14.21/2.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_208_B07AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 552389 completed with status 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 14.21/2.56  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 14.21/2.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 14.21/2.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 14.21/2.56  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 14.21/2.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 14.21/2.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 14.21/2.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 14.21/2.56  
% 14.21/2.56  % Proof found!
% 14.21/2.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 14.21/2.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.21/2.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 1330
% 14.21/2.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Initial clauses                      : 1330
% 14.21/2.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 14.21/2.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1323
% 14.21/2.56  % Processed clauses                    : 19349
% 14.21/2.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 763
% 14.21/2.56  % ...subsumed                          : 14598
% 14.21/2.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3988
% 14.21/2.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 347
% 14.21/2.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 55
% 14.21/2.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 61
% 14.21/2.56  % Generated clauses                    : 132630
% 14.21/2.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 103247
% 14.21/2.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 14.21/2.56  % Paramodulations                      : 132262
% 14.21/2.56  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 14.21/2.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 361
% 14.21/2.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 125835
% 14.21/2.56  % ...of those cached                   : 119723
% 14.21/2.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 14.21/2.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3871
% 14.21/2.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1313
% 14.21/2.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 14.21/2.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 749
% 14.21/2.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1794
% 14.21/2.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 85098
% 14.21/2.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 219367
% 14.21/2.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 122
% 14.21/2.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 372091
% 14.21/2.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 248599
% 14.21/2.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2897
% 14.21/2.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90088
% 14.21/2.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1224
% 14.21/2.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 166
% 14.21/2.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 14.21/2.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2171193
% 14.21/2.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2462
% 14.21/2.56  
% 14.21/2.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.21/2.56  % User time                : 1.937 s
% 14.21/2.56  % System time              : 0.106 s
% 14.21/2.56  % Total time               : 2.043 s
% 14.21/2.56  % Maximum resident set size: 6084 pages
% 14.21/2.56  
% 14.21/2.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.21/2.56  % User time                : 9.738 s
% 14.21/2.56  % System time              : 0.449 s
% 14.21/2.56  % Total time               : 10.187 s
% 14.21/2.56  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 14.21/2.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------