%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV617-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 10 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_power__one_0,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X)
| c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X),Y,X) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_power__one_0) ).
cnf(cls_root__unity_0,axiom,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(X),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_root__unity_0) ).
cnf(cls_eq__iff__diff__eq__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X)
| c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,Y,X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_eq__iff__diff__eq__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_divide__zero__left_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),Y,X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_divide__zero__left_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(373,plain,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_root__unity_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield) ).
cnf(498,plain,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_eq__iff__diff__eq__0_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add]) ).
cnf(542,plain,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_power__one_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult]) ).
cnf(543,plain,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[373,498,542,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(545,plain,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_divide__zero__left_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield]) ).
cnf(546,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[543,545,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWV617-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:27:47 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.51 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.51 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 "."
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T05:27:48
% 0.21/0.51 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T05:27:48
% 0.47/0.71 WARNING:
% 0.47/0.71 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.71 WARNING:
% 0.47/0.71 |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.71 WARNING:
% 0.47/0.71 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80 #||
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.80 ||#
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.80 ; 1105 formulas have been input or derived (from 165 formulas).
% 0.61/0.80 ; 546 (49%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.61/0.80 ; 12 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.80 ; 534 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.80 ;
% 0.61/0.80 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.164 58% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.017 6% Assert (766 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.035 12% Process new row (1,018 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.009 3% Resolution (328 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (164 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (2 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.005 2% Condensing (458 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.007 2% Forward subsumption (458 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.005 2% Backward subsumption (368 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.002 1% Clause clause subsumption (480 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.011 4% Forward simplification (802 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.001 0% Backward simplification (545 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (189 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.003 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.023 8% Other
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.282 Total
% 0.61/0.80 ; 0.284 Real time
% 0.61/0.80 ;
% 0.61/0.80 ; Term-hash-array has 765 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.80 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 360 entries (360 at peak, 368 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,110 nodes (1,110 at peak, 1,145 added, 35 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Retrieved 375 possibly forward subsuming rows in 458 calls.
% 0.61/0.80 ; Retrieved 253 possibly backward subsumed rows in 368 calls.
% 0.61/0.80 ; Path-index has 742 entries (747 at peak, 776 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Path-index has 1,914 nodes (1,938 at peak, 1,988 added, 74 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Trie-index has 742 entries (747 at peak, 776 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Trie-index has 2,448 nodes (2,491 at peak, 2,656 added, 208 deleted).
% 0.61/0.80 ; Retrieved 238 generalization terms in 626 calls.
% 0.61/0.80 ; Retrieved 198 instance terms in 176 calls.
% 0.61/0.80 ; Retrieved 6,896 unifiable terms in 902 calls.
% 0.61/0.80 ;
% 0.61/0.80 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 291 entries:
% 0.61/0.80 ; 1 with value 14 3 with value 23 5 with value 34
% 0.61/0.80 ; 8 with value 15 18 with value 24 4 with value 35
% 0.61/0.80 ; 19 with value 16 9 with value 25 2 with value 36
% 0.61/0.80 ; 19 with value 17 5 with value 26 2 with value 37
% 0.61/0.80 ; 36 with value 18 62 with value 27 7 with value 39
% 0.61/0.80 ; 35 with value 19 2 with value 28 1 with value 42
% 0.61/0.80 ; 13 with value 20 8 with value 29 1 with value 45
% 0.61/0.80 ; 12 with value 21 4 with value 30 1 with value 46
% 0.61/0.80 ; 9 with value 22 4 with value 33 1 with value 52
% 0.61/0.80 ; The agenda of rows to give has 78 entries:
% 0.61/0.80 ; 9 with value (4 6) 8 with value (4 9) 24 with value (4 11)
% 0.61/0.80 ; 11 with value (4 8) 10 with value (4 10) 16 with value (4 12)
% 0.61/0.80 Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.80 0.285 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.80 0.264362 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.80 0.020129 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.80 [Run times include 0.007 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.80 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.80 0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.80 17,868,808 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.80 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.80 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T05:27:48
% 0.61/0.80 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.80 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------