↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV682-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:08:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 56.15s 7.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 56.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  15 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_mult__1__left_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(VAR_0),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(VAR_0)),VAR_1) = VAR_1
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__left_0) ).

cnf(c_366,plain,
    ( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(A),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(A)),B) = B
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__left_0]) ).

fof(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).

cnf(c_368,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult]) ).

cnf(c_488,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),A) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_368,c_366]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(VAR_3,hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0) ).

cnf(c_666,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),E),F) = hAPP(D,hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(hAPP(VAR_3,VAR_5),hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0) ).

cnf(c_668,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),D),E),F) = hAPP(hAPP(D,F),hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_Suc__n__not__n_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : hAPP(c_Suc,VAR_0) != VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__n__not__n_0) ).

cnf(c_763,plain,
    hAPP(c_Suc,A) != A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__n__not__n_0]) ).

cnf(c_1495,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),D),hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),E) = hAPP(hAPP(D,E),E),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_488,c_668]) ).

cnf(c_13259,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),hAPP(c_COMBB(D,E,F),V6)),hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),V7) = hAPP(V6,hAPP(V7,V7)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1495,c_666]) ).

cnf(c_13261,plain,
    A != hAPP(c_Suc,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_763]) ).

cnf(c_13260,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13259,c_13261]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV682-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 14:44:25 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 3978770 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 14:44:25 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 56.15/7.65  
% 56.15/7.65  % given #500 (I,wt=72): 1307 c_Series_Osuminf(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_fun(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_nat),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),A)),A),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) | -c_Series_Osummable(A,tc_Complex_Ocomplex).  [factor(554,b,c),rewrite([589(26)])].
% 56.15/7.65  
% 56.15/7.65  % given #1000 (F,wt=50): 9441 -hBOOL(hAPP(c_lessequals(hAPP(c_Suc,c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(v_n,A,tc_nat),B,tc_nat)),tc_nat),c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(v_i,A,tc_nat),B,tc_nat))).  [para(929(a,1),9298(a,1,1,1,2)),rewrite([929(16)])].
% 56.15/7.65  
% 56.15/7.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 56.15/7.65  
% 56.15/7.65  % Proof 1 at 6.09 (+ 1.05) seconds.
% 56.15/7.65  % Length of proof is 9.
% 56.15/7.65  % Level of proof is 4.
% 56.15/7.65  % Maximum clause weight is 65.000.
% 56.15/7.65  % Given clauses 1194.
% 56.15/7.65  
% 56.15/7.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------