↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV684-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:08:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 64.31s 9.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 64.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  15 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(clsarity_nat__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add(tc_nat),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clsarity_nat__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add) ).

cnf(c_200,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add(tc_nat),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clsarity_nat__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add]) ).

fof(cls_add__0__left_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(VAR_0),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(VAR_0)),VAR_1) = VAR_1
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_add__0__left_0) ).

cnf(c_202,plain,
    ( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(A),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)),B) = B
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_add__0__left_0]) ).

cnf(c_359,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),A) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_202]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(VAR_3,hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0) ).

cnf(c_445,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),E),F) = hAPP(D,hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(hAPP(VAR_3,VAR_5),hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0) ).

cnf(c_447,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),D),E),F) = hAPP(hAPP(D,F),hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_Suc__n__not__n_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : hAPP(c_Suc,VAR_0) != VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__n__not__n_0) ).

cnf(c_540,plain,
    hAPP(c_Suc,A) != A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__n__not__n_0]) ).

cnf(c_890,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),D),hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),E) = hAPP(hAPP(D,E),E),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_359,c_447]) ).

cnf(c_987,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),c_Suc),D),E) != hAPP(D,E),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_445,c_540]) ).

cnf(c_989,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(D,E),E) = hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C),D),hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),E),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_890]) ).

cnf(c_988,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_987,c_989]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV684-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.65  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.65  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.65  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.65  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.65  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.65  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.65  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.65  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 14:44:10 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.66  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.66  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.22/0.66  % Process 3977998 was started by sandbox2 on n007,
% 0.22/0.66  % Sat Sep 26 14:44:10 2026
% 0.22/0.66  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.22/0.70  
% 0.22/0.70  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 64.31/9.48  
% 64.31/9.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 64.31/9.48  
% 64.31/9.48  % Proof 1 at 0.66 (+ 0.05) seconds.
% 64.31/9.48  % Length of proof is 9.
% 64.31/9.48  % Level of proof is 3.
% 64.31/9.48  % Maximum clause weight is 30.000.
% 64.31/9.48  % Given clauses 170.
% 64.31/9.48  
% 64.31/9.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------