%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV686-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 61.14s 11.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 61.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 25 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 34 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 1 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 97 ( 33 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_class__ringb_Oadd__r0__iff_0,axiom,
( X2 != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3)
| ~ class_Int_Onumber__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__ringb_Oadd__r0__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I2_J_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),X3)),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1))),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I2_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_mult__1__right_0,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__right_0) ).
cnf(cls_one__neq__zero_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_one__neq__zero_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X3),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Onumber__ring,axiom,
class_Int_Onumber__ring(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Onumber__ring) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_COMBS__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),hAPP(X2,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBS__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBB__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBB__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBI__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBI__def_0) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X2 != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3)
| ~ class_Int_Onumber__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__ringb_Oadd__r0__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),X3)),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1))),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I2_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__right_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_one__neq__zero_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X2 != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3)
| ~ class_Int_Onumber__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),X3)),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1))),X3) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)) = X2 ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X3),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X2)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X2)
| ~ class_Int_Onumber__ring(X2)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2),X3),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X2))),X1) != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2),X3),X1)
| X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
class_Int_Onumber__ring(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Onumber__ring ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X2),X3) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1),X3),X2) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != X1,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),X2) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),hAPP(X2,X6)),
cls_COMBS__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBB__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),X1) != X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5,X6,X7,X8),X9) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X5,X9))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),X4,X5,X6,X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X4,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
cls_COMBI__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),c_COMBI(X4),X5,X6,X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,X8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV686-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:20:46 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 61.14/11.01 % Version: 3.5.1
% 61.14/11.01 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 61.14/11.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3945213 completed with status 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 61.14/11.01 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 61.14/11.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 61.14/11.01 % No SInE strategy applied
% 61.14/11.01 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 61.14/11.01 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 3945223 completed with status 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 61.14/11.01 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 61.14/11.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 61.14/11.01 % No SInE strategy applied
% 61.14/11.01 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 61.14/11.01 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 61.14/11.01 % Preprocessing time : 0.228 s
% 61.14/11.01
% 61.14/11.01 % Proof found!
% 61.14/11.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 61.14/11.01 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 61.14/11.01 % Parsed axioms : 566
% 61.14/11.01 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Initial clauses : 566
% 61.14/11.01 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Initial clauses in saturation : 566
% 61.14/11.01 % Processed clauses : 4549
% 61.14/11.01 % ...of these trivial : 90
% 61.14/11.01 % ...subsumed : 2900
% 61.14/11.01 % ...remaining for further processing : 1559
% 61.14/11.01 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 25
% 61.14/11.01 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Backward-subsumed : 48
% 61.14/11.01 % Backward-rewritten : 19
% 61.14/11.01 % Generated clauses : 168110
% 61.14/11.01 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 162884
% 61.14/11.01 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 61.14/11.01 % Paramodulations : 168034
% 61.14/11.01 % Factorizations : 18
% 61.14/11.01 % NegExts : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Equation resolutions : 58
% 61.14/11.01 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Total rewrite steps : 57849
% 61.14/11.01 % ...of those cached : 52006
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional check models : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 61.14/11.01 % Current number of processed clauses : 1492
% 61.14/11.01 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 130
% 61.14/11.01 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 29
% 61.14/11.01 % Negative unit clauses : 74
% 61.14/11.01 % Non-unit-clauses : 1259
% 61.14/11.01 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 158593
% 61.14/11.01 % ...number of literals in the above : 576093
% 61.14/11.01 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Current number of archived clauses : 67
% 61.14/11.01 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188186
% 61.14/11.01 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56793
% 61.14/11.01 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1760
% 61.14/11.01 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3226
% 61.14/11.01 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3593
% 61.14/11.01 % BW rewrite match successes : 176
% 61.14/11.01 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Condensation successes : 0
% 61.14/11.01 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5645245
% 61.14/11.01 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1231
% 61.14/11.01
% 61.14/11.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 61.14/11.01 % User time : 9.928 s
% 61.14/11.01 % System time : 0.323 s
% 61.14/11.01 % Total time : 10.251 s
% 61.14/11.01 % Maximum resident set size: 4368 pages
% 61.14/11.01
% 61.14/11.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 61.14/11.01 % User time : 49.058 s
% 61.14/11.01 % System time : 1.462 s
% 61.14/11.01 % Total time : 50.520 s
% 61.14/11.01 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 61.14/11.01 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------