↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV721-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 99.59s 15.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 99.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  11   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  27   !;   0   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f443,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OSnd_0) ).

fof(f448,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OInj_0) ).

fof(f450,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X2,X3,X0),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | c_in(X0,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Says__imp__spies_0) ).

fof(f453,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X2,X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OBody_0) ).

fof(f463,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f464,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_882,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f443]) ).

tcf(c_887,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f448]) ).

tcf(c_889,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X2,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f450]) ).

tcf(c_891,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f453]) ).

tcf(c_901,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f463]) ).

tcf(c_902,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f464]) ).

tcf(c_32221,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_891,c_887]) ).

tcf(c_58613,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_889,c_901]) ).

tcf(c_58949,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_58613,c_32221]) ).

tcf(c_59115,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_58949,c_882]) ).

tcf(c_59553,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59115,c_882]) ).

tcf(c_63876,plain,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59553,c_882]) ).

tcf(c_63878,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_63876,c_902]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV721-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:01:34 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.46  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.47  % Proving...
% 99.59/15.65  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 99.59/15.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------  iProver source info
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 99.59/15.65  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 99.59/15.65  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 22  sf_s  rm: 13 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 6 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Proving...
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % 
% 99.59/15.65  % clauses                               339
% 99.59/15.65  % conjectures                           2
% 99.59/15.65  % EPR                                   20
% 99.59/15.65  % Horn                                  306
% 99.59/15.65  % unary                                 110
% 99.59/15.65  % binary                                150
% 99.59/15.65  % lits                                  666
% 99.59/15.65  % lits eq                               181
% 99.59/15.65  % fd_pure                               0
% 99.59/15.65  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 99.59/15.65  % fd_cond                               3
% 99.59/15.65  % fd_pseudo_cond                        41
% 99.59/15.65  % AC symbols                            0
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ 
% 99.59/15.65  % Current options:
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % ------ Proving...
% 99.59/15.65  % 
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 99.59/15.65  
% 99.59/15.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------