%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV722-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 80.31s 11.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 80.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn 26 !; 0 ?; 13 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f528,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OSnd_0) ).
fof(f529,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OFst_0) ).
fof(f534,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X2,X3,X0),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Says__imp__parts__knows__Spy_0) ).
fof(f539,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X2,X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OBody_0) ).
fof(f553,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f554,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
tcf(c_1032,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f528]) ).
tcf(c_1033,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f529]) ).
tcf(c_1038,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f534]) ).
tcf(c_1042,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f539]) ).
tcf(c_1055,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f553]) ).
tcf(c_1056,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f554]) ).
tcf(c_16889,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1038]) ).
tcf(c_22872,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1042]) ).
tcf(c_32251,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1032]) ).
tcf(c_37170,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1032]) ).
tcf(c_51496,plain,
( c_in(v_K,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1033]) ).
tcf(c_51498,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_51496,c_37170,c_32251,c_22872,c_16889,c_1055,c_1056]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV722-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 20:59:17 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.42 % Proving...
% 80.31/11.92 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 80.31/11.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ iProver source info
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 80.31/11.92 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 80.31/11.92 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 25 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 6 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Proving...
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Problem Properties
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 %
% 80.31/11.92 % clauses 388
% 80.31/11.92 % conjectures 2
% 80.31/11.92 % EPR 22
% 80.31/11.92 % Horn 353
% 80.31/11.92 % unary 136
% 80.31/11.92 % binary 166
% 80.31/11.92 % lits 745
% 80.31/11.92 % lits eq 215
% 80.31/11.92 % fd_pure 0
% 80.31/11.92 % fd_pseudo 0
% 80.31/11.92 % fd_cond 3
% 80.31/11.92 % fd_pseudo_cond 45
% 80.31/11.92 % AC symbols 0
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------
% 80.31/11.92 % Current options:
% 80.31/11.92 % ------
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 %
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % ------ Proving...
% 80.31/11.92 %
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 80.31/11.92
% 80.31/11.92
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------