%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV724-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 5.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 0 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_analz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Spy__see__shrK_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__see__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_not__parts__not__analz_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_not__parts__not__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_analz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Spy__see__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_not__parts__not__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,v_evs)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV724-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/5.46 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/5.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:21:33 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/5.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/5.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/5.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/5.70 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/5.70 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2509506 completed with status 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.23/5.70 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/5.70 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/5.70 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/5.70 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2509513 completed with status 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.23/5.70 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/5.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/5.70 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/5.70 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/5.70 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/5.70 % Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/5.70 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/5.70
% 0.23/5.70 % Proof found!
% 0.23/5.70 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/5.70 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/5.70 % Parsed axioms : 567
% 0.23/5.70 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Initial clauses : 567
% 0.23/5.70 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.23/5.70 % Initial clauses in saturation : 563
% 0.23/5.70 % Processed clauses : 808
% 0.23/5.70 % ...of these trivial : 38
% 0.23/5.70 % ...subsumed : 124
% 0.23/5.70 % ...remaining for further processing : 646
% 0.23/5.70 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.23/5.70 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.23/5.70 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.23/5.70 % Generated clauses : 296
% 0.23/5.70 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 163
% 0.23/5.70 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Paramodulations : 266
% 0.23/5.70 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Equation resolutions : 29
% 0.23/5.70 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Total rewrite steps : 178
% 0.23/5.70 % ...of those cached : 73
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/5.70 % Current number of processed clauses : 218
% 0.23/5.70 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 78
% 0.23/5.70 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Negative unit clauses : 54
% 0.23/5.70 % Non-unit-clauses : 86
% 0.23/5.70 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 334
% 0.23/5.70 % ...number of literals in the above : 682
% 0.23/5.70 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Current number of archived clauses : 430
% 0.23/5.70 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21818
% 0.23/5.70 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16084
% 0.23/5.70 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 60
% 0.23/5.70 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1525
% 0.23/5.70 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 1
% 0.23/5.70 % BW rewrite match attempts : 156
% 0.23/5.70 % BW rewrite match successes : 29
% 0.23/5.70 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/5.70 % Termbank termtop insertions : 26878
% 0.23/5.70 % Search garbage collected termcells : 924
% 0.23/5.70
% 0.23/5.70 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/5.70 % User time : 0.101 s
% 0.23/5.70 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/5.70 % Total time : 0.117 s
% 0.23/5.70 % Maximum resident set size: 4584 pages
% 0.23/5.70
% 0.23/5.70 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/5.70 % User time : 0.490 s
% 0.23/5.70 % System time : 0.065 s
% 0.23/5.70 % Total time : 0.554 s
% 0.23/5.70 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.23/5.70 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------