%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV727-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 35.79s 10.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 35.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 54 ( 31 unt; 4 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 87 ( 18 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 74 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_mem__def_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_invKey__K_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_invKey__K_0) ).
cnf(cls_equalityI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_equalityI_0) ).
cnf(cls_keysFor__parts__insert_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X3,X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_keysFor__parts__insert_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_analz__increasing_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz__increasing_0) ).
cnf(cls_analz__analz__Un_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz__analz__Un_0) ).
cnf(cls_Un__absorb_0,axiom,
c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Un__absorb_0) ).
cnf(cls_analz__idem_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz__idem_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Un__upper2_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X1,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Un__upper2_0) ).
cnf(cls_usedI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_usedI_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts__analz_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts__analz_0) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_invKey__K_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_equalityI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X3,X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_keysFor__parts__insert_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),v_K)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
cls_analz__increasing_0 ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),
cls_analz__analz__Un_0 ).
cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)) = X1,
cls_Un__absorb_0 ).
cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
cls_analz__idem_0 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X3,X2,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = v_K,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X1,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))
| c_Message_Oanalz(X1) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X1,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),
cls_Un__upper2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),v_X)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_usedI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),X1,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)))),tc_nat) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
cls_parts__analz_0 ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_45 ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_48]),c_0_32]),c_0_49])]),c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_44]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV727-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:22:06 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.79/10.68 % Version: 3.5.1
% 35.79/10.68 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.79/10.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2510448 completed with status 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 35.79/10.68 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.79/10.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.79/10.68 % No SInE strategy applied
% 35.79/10.68 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 35.79/10.68 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2510457 completed with status 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 35.79/10.68 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.79/10.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.79/10.68 % No SInE strategy applied
% 35.79/10.68 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 35.79/10.68 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 35.79/10.68 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 35.79/10.68 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 35.79/10.68
% 35.79/10.68 % Proof found!
% 35.79/10.68 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 35.79/10.68 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 35.79/10.68 % Parsed axioms : 493
% 35.79/10.68 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Initial clauses : 493
% 35.79/10.68 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 35.79/10.68 % Initial clauses in saturation : 490
% 35.79/10.68 % Processed clauses : 35537
% 35.79/10.68 % ...of these trivial : 939
% 35.79/10.68 % ...subsumed : 29085
% 35.79/10.68 % ...remaining for further processing : 5513
% 35.79/10.68 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 329
% 35.79/10.68 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Backward-subsumed : 712
% 35.79/10.68 % Backward-rewritten : 193
% 35.79/10.68 % Generated clauses : 343890
% 35.79/10.68 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 306438
% 35.79/10.68 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 35.79/10.68 % Paramodulations : 343525
% 35.79/10.68 % Factorizations : 3
% 35.79/10.68 % NegExts : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Equation resolutions : 362
% 35.79/10.68 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Total rewrite steps : 232473
% 35.79/10.68 % ...of those cached : 204163
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional check models : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional encoding time : 0.430
% 35.79/10.68 % Propositional solver time : 0.242
% 35.79/10.68 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 35.79/10.68 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 35.79/10.68 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 35.79/10.68 % Current number of processed clauses : 4235
% 35.79/10.68 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1252
% 35.79/10.68 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 35
% 35.79/10.68 % Negative unit clauses : 1049
% 35.79/10.68 % Non-unit-clauses : 1899
% 35.79/10.68 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 267603
% 35.79/10.68 % ...number of literals in the above : 569373
% 35.79/10.68 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Current number of archived clauses : 1279
% 35.79/10.68 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 682276
% 35.79/10.68 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 544869
% 35.79/10.68 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5978
% 35.79/10.68 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 274705
% 35.79/10.68 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 124
% 35.79/10.68 % BW rewrite match attempts : 10828
% 35.79/10.68 % BW rewrite match successes : 451
% 35.79/10.68 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Condensation successes : 0
% 35.79/10.68 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9724627
% 35.79/10.68 % Search garbage collected termcells : 792
% 35.79/10.68
% 35.79/10.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.79/10.68 % User time : 4.880 s
% 35.79/10.68 % System time : 0.204 s
% 35.79/10.68 % Total time : 5.084 s
% 35.79/10.68 % Maximum resident set size: 4496 pages
% 35.79/10.68
% 35.79/10.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.79/10.68 % User time : 24.470 s
% 35.79/10.68 % System time : 0.889 s
% 35.79/10.68 % Total time : 25.359 s
% 35.79/10.68 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 35.79/10.68 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------