↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV734-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (   2 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_mem__def_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_parts_OBody_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OBody_0) ).

cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_parts__cut_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts__cut_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_Un__empty__left_0,axiom,
    c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Un__empty__left_0) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts_OBody_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts__cut_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = X2,
    cls_Un__empty__left_0 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),v_X)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_Xa,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV734-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.57  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.57  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.57  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.57  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.57  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.57  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.57  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.57  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:17:42 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.57  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.57  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.62  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.78  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1976952 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.78  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.78  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.78  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1976960 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.78  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.78  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.78  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.78  % Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.78  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.78  
% 0.15/0.78  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.78  % Parsed axioms                        : 488
% 0.15/0.78  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Initial clauses                      : 488
% 0.15/0.78  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.15/0.78  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 487
% 0.15/0.78  % Processed clauses                    : 1059
% 0.15/0.78  % ...of these trivial                  : 31
% 0.15/0.78  % ...subsumed                          : 182
% 0.15/0.78  % ...remaining for further processing  : 846
% 0.15/0.78  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 18
% 0.15/0.78  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 0.15/0.78  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 0.15/0.78  % Generated clauses                    : 3209
% 0.15/0.78  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2427
% 0.15/0.78  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.15/0.78  % Paramodulations                      : 3165
% 0.15/0.78  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Equation resolutions                 : 44
% 0.15/0.78  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1241
% 0.15/0.78  % ...of those cached                   : 778
% 0.15/0.78  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.78  % Current number of processed clauses  : 435
% 0.15/0.78  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 148
% 0.15/0.78  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.15/0.78  %    Negative unit clauses             : 52
% 0.15/0.78  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 232
% 0.15/0.78  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2217
% 0.15/0.78  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4729
% 0.15/0.78  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Current number of archived clauses   : 412
% 0.15/0.78  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20390
% 0.15/0.78  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18971
% 0.15/0.78  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 85
% 0.15/0.78  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 743
% 0.15/0.78  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 347
% 0.15/0.78  % BW rewrite match successes           : 87
% 0.15/0.78  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.78  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 67991
% 0.15/0.78  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 808
% 0.15/0.78  
% 0.15/0.78  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.78  % User time                : 0.121 s
% 0.15/0.78  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.78  % Total time               : 0.130 s
% 0.15/0.78  % Maximum resident set size: 4496 pages
% 0.15/0.78  
% 0.15/0.78  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.78  % User time                : 0.580 s
% 0.15/0.78  % System time              : 0.049 s
% 0.15/0.78  % Total time               : 0.629 s
% 0.15/0.78  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.78  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------