↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV746-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.71s 1.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  19 unt;   8 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   63 (  36 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (  32 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_keymode_Oinduct_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_keymode_Oinduct_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).

cnf(cls_insert__commute_0,axiom,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X3,X4),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__commute_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_0) ).

cnf(cls_bot1E_0,axiom,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_bot1E_0) ).

cnf(cls_agent_Osimps_I7_J_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oagent_OSpy != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_agent_Osimps_I7_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_agent_Osimps_I2_J_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_agent_Osimps_I2_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_keymode_Oinduct_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    cls_insert__code_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X3,X4),X4),
    cls_insert__commute_0 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__code_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_bot1E_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X2,X3),X1))
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OSpy != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_agent_Osimps_I7_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_agent_Osimps_I2_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OSpy != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
    | c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1) = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature != c_Message_Oagent_OServer
    | c_Message_Oagent_OFriend(X1) = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
    | c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption != c_Message_Oagent_OServer ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature != c_Message_Oagent_OServer
    | c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption != c_Message_Oagent_OServer
    | c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption = c_Message_Oagent_OSpy ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( X2 = X1
    | X2 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
    | c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption = c_Message_Oagent_OServer ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption
    | c_Message_Oagent_OServer = X1 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV746-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:23:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.71/1.39  % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.71/1.39  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.71/1.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2801058 completed with status 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 6.71/1.39  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.71/1.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.71/1.39  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.71/1.39  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 6.71/1.39  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2801062 completed with status 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.71/1.39  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.71/1.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.71/1.39  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.71/1.39  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 6.71/1.39  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.71/1.39  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.71/1.39  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 6.71/1.39  
% 6.71/1.39  % Proof found!
% 6.71/1.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.71/1.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.71/1.39  % Parsed axioms                        : 557
% 6.71/1.39  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Initial clauses                      : 557
% 6.71/1.39  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 557
% 6.71/1.39  % Processed clauses                    : 5245
% 6.71/1.39  % ...of these trivial                  : 1175
% 6.71/1.39  % ...subsumed                          : 2096
% 6.71/1.39  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1974
% 6.71/1.39  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 488
% 6.71/1.39  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Backward-subsumed                    : 49
% 6.71/1.39  % Backward-rewritten                   : 229
% 6.71/1.39  % Generated clauses                    : 89032
% 6.71/1.39  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 74339
% 6.71/1.39  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 6.71/1.39  % Paramodulations                      : 88472
% 6.71/1.39  % Factorizations                       : 43
% 6.71/1.39  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Equation resolutions                 : 517
% 6.71/1.39  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Total rewrite steps                  : 42697
% 6.71/1.39  % ...of those cached                   : 36740
% 6.71/1.39  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.71/1.39  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1696
% 6.71/1.39  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 853
% 6.71/1.39  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 6.71/1.39  %    Negative unit clauses             : 57
% 6.71/1.39  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 778
% 6.71/1.39  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62785
% 6.71/1.39  % ...number of literals in the above   : 156120
% 6.71/1.39  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Current number of archived clauses   : 278
% 6.71/1.39  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 137802
% 6.71/1.39  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95364
% 6.71/1.39  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1962
% 6.71/1.39  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10050
% 6.71/1.39  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1
% 6.71/1.39  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 19025
% 6.71/1.39  % BW rewrite match successes           : 267
% 6.71/1.39  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.71/1.39  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1171158
% 6.71/1.39  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1009
% 6.71/1.39  
% 6.71/1.39  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.71/1.39  % User time                : 0.876 s
% 6.71/1.39  % System time              : 0.049 s
% 6.71/1.39  % Total time               : 0.925 s
% 6.71/1.39  % Maximum resident set size: 4620 pages
% 6.71/1.39  
% 6.71/1.39  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.71/1.39  % User time                : 4.191 s
% 6.71/1.39  % System time              : 0.226 s
% 6.71/1.39  % Total time               : 4.416 s
% 6.71/1.39  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 6.71/1.39  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------