↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV749-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 9.16s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  25 unt;   6 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  31 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (  47 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_keymode_Oinduct_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_keymode_Oinduct_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).

cnf(cls_insert__commute_0,axiom,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X3,X4),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__commute_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_0) ).

cnf(cls_self__append__conv2_0,axiom,
    ( X1 != c_List_Oappend(X2,X1,X3)
    | X2 = c_List_Olist_ONil(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_self__append__conv2_0) ).

cnf(cls_list_Osimps_I2_J_0,axiom,
    c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X3,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list_Osimps_I2_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_Cons__eq__append__conv_5,axiom,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Oappend(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X4),X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Cons__eq__append__conv_5) ).

cnf(cls_bot1E_0,axiom,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_bot1E_0) ).

cnf(cls_not__Cons__self_0,axiom,
    X1 != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X1,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_not__Cons__self_0) ).

cnf(cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0,axiom,
    X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_keymode_Oinduct_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    cls_insert__code_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X3,X4),X4),
    cls_insert__commute_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__code_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X3,X4),X4),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 != c_List_Oappend(X2,X1,X3)
    | X2 = c_List_Olist_ONil(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_self__append__conv2_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X3,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_list_Osimps_I2_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3,X1,X4),X2))
    | X3 = X2
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X1 != c_List_Oappend(X2,X1,X3)
    | X2 = c_List_Olist_ONil(X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Oappend(X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X4),X3,X4),
    cls_Cons__eq__append__conv_5 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X3,X1),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_bot1E_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X2,X3),X1))
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Oappend(X2,X3,X4),X4) != X3,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    X1 != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X1,X3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_not__Cons__self_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,c_List_Oappend(X3,X4,X5),X5),X5) != X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
    cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    X1 != c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X1,X3),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption
    | X1 = c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X3,X4),X4) != X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X2) = c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption,X2) != c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_33]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV749-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:23:34 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.16/1.80  % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.16/1.80  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.16/1.80  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2232453 completed with status 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 9.16/1.80  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.16/1.80  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.16/1.80  % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.16/1.80  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 9.16/1.80  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2232460 completed with status 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 9.16/1.80  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.16/1.80  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.16/1.80  % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.16/1.80  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 9.16/1.80  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.16/1.80  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.16/1.80  % Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 9.16/1.80  
% 9.16/1.80  % Proof found!
% 9.16/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.16/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.16/1.80  % Parsed axioms                        : 692
% 9.16/1.80  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Initial clauses                      : 692
% 9.16/1.80  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 9.16/1.80  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 688
% 9.16/1.80  % Processed clauses                    : 5336
% 9.16/1.80  % ...of these trivial                  : 1427
% 9.16/1.80  % ...subsumed                          : 1752
% 9.16/1.80  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2157
% 9.16/1.80  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 96
% 9.16/1.80  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Backward-subsumed                    : 39
% 9.16/1.80  % Backward-rewritten                   : 273
% 9.16/1.80  % Generated clauses                    : 53048
% 9.16/1.80  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36434
% 9.16/1.80  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Paramodulations                      : 52907
% 9.16/1.80  % Factorizations                       : 11
% 9.16/1.80  % NegExts                              : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Equation resolutions                 : 130
% 9.16/1.80  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Total rewrite steps                  : 38260
% 9.16/1.80  % ...of those cached                   : 32537
% 9.16/1.80  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 9.16/1.80  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1845
% 9.16/1.80  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1021
% 9.16/1.80  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 9.16/1.80  %    Negative unit clauses             : 101
% 9.16/1.80  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 714
% 9.16/1.80  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31374
% 9.16/1.80  % ...number of literals in the above   : 57965
% 9.16/1.80  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Current number of archived clauses   : 314
% 9.16/1.80  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 137267
% 9.16/1.80  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101877
% 9.16/1.80  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1570
% 9.16/1.80  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9749
% 9.16/1.80  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 3
% 9.16/1.80  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 22255
% 9.16/1.80  % BW rewrite match successes           : 294
% 9.16/1.80  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.16/1.80  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 753499
% 9.16/1.80  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1221
% 9.16/1.80  
% 9.16/1.80  % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.16/1.80  % User time                : 1.135 s
% 9.16/1.80  % System time              : 0.058 s
% 9.16/1.80  % Total time               : 1.193 s
% 9.16/1.80  % Maximum resident set size: 4964 pages
% 9.16/1.80  
% 9.16/1.80  % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.16/1.80  % User time                : 5.516 s
% 9.16/1.80  % System time              : 0.273 s
% 9.16/1.80  % Total time               : 5.789 s
% 9.16/1.80  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 9.16/1.80  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------