↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV756-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.10s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   32 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   3 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  14 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_insert__absorb_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__absorb_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).

cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_10,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_10) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_KAB,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Crypt__imp__keysFor_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Crypt__imp__keysFor_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_evs2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_new__keys__not__used_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_new__keys__not__used_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__absorb_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    cls_insert__code_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
    cls_conjecture_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_KAB,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Crypt__imp__keysFor_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_OsymKeys,v_KAB)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_evs2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_new__keys__not__used_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_KAB,c_Message_OsymKeys,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,v_evs2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_KAB,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2))),tc_nat)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_evs2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_24])]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV756-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:23:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.10/0.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.10/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1408148 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.10/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.10/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1408164 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.10/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.10/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 354s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 1.10/0.64  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.10/0.64  
% 1.10/0.64  % Proof found!
% 1.10/0.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.10/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.10/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 590
% 1.10/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 590
% 1.10/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 1.10/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 589
% 1.10/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 1785
% 1.10/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 48
% 1.10/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 657
% 1.10/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1080
% 1.10/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 30
% 1.10/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 1.10/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 29
% 1.10/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 3406
% 1.10/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2758
% 1.10/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 3353
% 1.10/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 53
% 1.10/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1599
% 1.10/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 1021
% 1.10/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.10/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 578
% 1.10/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 205
% 1.10/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 1.10/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 143
% 1.10/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 224
% 1.10/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1923
% 1.10/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3536
% 1.10/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 503
% 1.10/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35689
% 1.10/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26814
% 1.10/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 292
% 1.10/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3283
% 1.10/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 6
% 1.10/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 534
% 1.10/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 130
% 1.10/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.10/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 80627
% 1.10/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1069
% 1.10/0.64  
% 1.10/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.64  % User time                : 0.153 s
% 1.10/0.64  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.10/0.64  % Total time               : 0.168 s
% 1.10/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4396 pages
% 1.10/0.64  
% 1.10/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.64  % User time                : 0.573 s
% 1.10/0.64  % System time              : 0.068 s
% 1.10/0.64  % Total time               : 0.641 s
% 1.10/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 1.10/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------