%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV772-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.27s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 8 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_self__append__conv2_1,axiom,
X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_self__append__conv2_1) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Spy__Says_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X3,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_knows__Spy__Says_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
cls_self__append__conv2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X3,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_knows__Spy__Says_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV772-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:24:50 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2234830 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.27/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.63 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2234838 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.27/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.63 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.63 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/0.63
% 0.27/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 450
% 0.27/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Initial clauses : 450
% 0.27/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.27/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 449
% 0.27/0.63 % Processed clauses : 134
% 0.27/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.27/0.63 % ...subsumed : 15
% 0.27/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 107
% 0.27/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.27/0.63 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.27/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.27/0.63 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 105
% 0.27/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.27/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.27/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 54
% 0.27/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 316
% 0.27/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 740
% 0.27/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.27/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1487
% 0.27/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1232
% 0.27/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.27/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72
% 0.27/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.27/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.27/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11421
% 0.27/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 698
% 0.27/0.63
% 0.27/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.63 % User time : 0.030 s
% 0.27/0.63 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.27/0.63 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.27/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4476 pages
% 0.27/0.63
% 0.27/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.63 % User time : 0.100 s
% 0.27/0.63 % System time : 0.033 s
% 0.27/0.63 % Total time : 0.133 s
% 0.27/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.27/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------