%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV778-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:59:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 5 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,hAPP(c_List_Orev(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nil__is__rev__conv_1,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) = hAPP(c_List_Orev(X1),c_List_Olist_ONil(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nil__is__rev__conv_1) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,hAPP(c_List_Orev(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,hAPP(c_List_Orev(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent))),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) = hAPP(c_List_Orev(X1),c_List_Olist_ONil(X1)),
cls_Nil__is__rev__conv_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV778-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:25:32 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 2584304 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 361s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2584309 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 443
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 315
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses : 128
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 128
% 0.15/0.45 % Processed clauses : 61
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % ...subsumed : 14
% 0.15/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.15/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.15/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Generated clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Paramodulations : 14
% 0.15/0.45 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.15/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 21
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 34
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 69
% 0.15/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 112
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 105
% 0.15/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 103
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.15/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.15/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5177
% 0.15/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1490
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4184 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------