↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWV779_5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:05:37 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.98s 4.16s
% Output   : Proof 3.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWV779_5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 13:02:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.98/4.16  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/4.16  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Type), Eq (rev A (nil A)) (nil A)) True
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A1 : agent), Eq (knows A1 (nil event)) (initState A1)) True
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #113 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Eq (knows spy (nil event)) (knows spy (rev event (nil event))))) True
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #120 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (Eq (rev a (nil a)) (nil a)) True
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #121 (by clausification #[120]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (rev a (nil a)) (nil a)
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #200 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : agent), Eq (Eq (knows a (nil event)) (initState a)) True
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #201 (by clausification #[200]): ∀ (a : agent), Eq (knows a (nil event)) (initState a)
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #336 (by clausification #[113]): Eq (Eq (knows spy (nil event)) (knows spy (rev event (nil event)))) False
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #337 (by clausification #[336]): Ne (knows spy (nil event)) (knows spy (rev event (nil event)))
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #338 (by forward demodulation #[337, 201]): Ne (initState spy) (knows spy (rev event (nil event)))
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #339 (by forward demodulation #[338, 121]): Ne (initState spy) (knows spy (nil event))
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #340 (by forward demodulation #[339, 201]): Ne (initState spy) (initState spy)
% 3.98/4.16  Clause #341 (by eliminate resolved literals #[340]): False
% 3.98/4.16  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------