%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV811-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_emptyE_0,axiom,
~ c_in(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_emptyE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_set__empty_1,axiom,
c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_ONil(X1),X1) = c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_set__empty_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
~ c_in(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_emptyE_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_ONil(X1),X1) = c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
cls_set__empty_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_in(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),X2),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV811-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.62 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.62 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.62 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.62 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.62 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.62 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.62 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.62 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:21:42 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.62 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.62 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.69 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.69 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.78 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.78 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1984031 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.78 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.78 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.78 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.78 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1984039 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.78 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.78 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.78 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.78 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.78 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.78 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.78 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.78
% 0.22/0.78 % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.78 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.78 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.78 % Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.22/0.78 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Initial clauses : 556
% 0.22/0.78 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.22/0.78 % Initial clauses in saturation : 555
% 0.22/0.78 % Processed clauses : 122
% 0.22/0.78 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.22/0.78 % ...subsumed : 28
% 0.22/0.78 % ...remaining for further processing : 86
% 0.22/0.78 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.22/0.78 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.22/0.78 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.22/0.78 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.78 % Current number of processed clauses : 84
% 0.22/0.78 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 0.22/0.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.79 % Negative unit clauses : 34
% 0.22/0.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.22/0.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 434
% 0.22/0.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 937
% 0.22/0.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 98
% 0.22/0.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.22/0.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.22/0.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 238
% 0.22/0.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.22/0.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.22/0.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 17067
% 0.22/0.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 968
% 0.22/0.79
% 0.22/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.79 % User time : 0.031 s
% 0.22/0.79 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.79 % Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.22/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4536 pages
% 0.22/0.79
% 0.22/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.79 % User time : 0.120 s
% 0.22/0.79 % System time : 0.041 s
% 0.22/0.79 % Total time : 0.162 s
% 0.22/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.22/0.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------