%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV812-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:06:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
v_A = c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_Spy__in__bad_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__in__bad_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
v_A = c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_Spy__in__bad_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV812-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:26:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % sh5l with pid 2075538 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2075539 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.48
% 0.26/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 581
% 0.26/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 32
% 0.26/0.48 % Initial clauses : 549
% 0.26/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 549
% 0.26/0.48 % Processed clauses : 17
% 0.26/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.26/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.26/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.26/0.48 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.26/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.26/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 532
% 0.26/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 1023
% 0.26/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 16056
% 0.26/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1169
% 0.26/0.48
% 0.26/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.48 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.48 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.48 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.26/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.48
% 0.26/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.48 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.26/0.48 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.26/0.48 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.26/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.26/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------