↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWV817-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:48:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV817-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 18:07:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.52/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.52/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % File     : SWV817-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.52/0.59  % Domain   : Software Verification
% 0.52/0.59  % Problem  : Hoare logic with procedures 112_1
% 0.52/0.59  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.52/0.59  % English  : Completeness is taken relative to completeness of the underlying
% 0.52/0.59  %            logic. Two versions of completeness proof: nested single recursion
% 0.52/0.59  %            and simultaneous recursion in call rule.
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Refs     : [Nip10] Nipkow (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.59  %          : [BN10]  Boehme & Nipkow (2010), Sledgehammer: Judgement Day
% 0.52/0.59  % Source   : [Nip10]
% 0.52/0.59  % Names    : Hoare-112_1 [Nip10]
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.59  % Rating   : 0.05 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.05 v5.3.0, 0.06 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0
% 0.52/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   4 unt;   1 nHn;   4 RR)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Number of literals    :   10 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.59  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   4 sgn)
% 0.52/0.59  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Comments :
% 0.52/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_id__apply_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.59      c_Fun_Oid(V_x,T_a) = V_x ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_id__def_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.59      c_Fun_Oid(v_x,t_a) = v_x ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_state__not__singleton__def__raw_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.59      ( v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2
% 0.52/0.59      | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ) ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_state__not__singleton__def_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.59      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
% 0.52/0.59      | V_x = V_xa ) ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_state__not__singleton__def_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.59      ( v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2
% 0.52/0.59      | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ) ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.59      c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.59      V_s = v_x ).
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60  %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:4)
% 0.52/0.60  %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.52/0.60  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.52/0.60  %goalClause: 5 6
% 0.52/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.52/0.60  [5]P1(a5000)
% 0.52/0.60  [6]E(x61,a1)
% 0.52/0.60  [7]~E(a2,a5)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.52/0.60  [8]~E(a3,a4)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.52/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.52/0.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.52/0.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.52/0.60  [4]~P1(x41)+P1(x42)+~E(x41,x42)
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(10,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a1,x101)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (P1(a1)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,6,2,4])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(x121,a1)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(rename_variables,[],[6])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(x131,a5000)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,6,12,2,4,3])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (~E(a2,a5)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(x181,x182)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,10,11,13,2,4,3])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     ($false),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,18]),
% 0.52/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------