%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:48:34 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 16:27:23 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.19/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.19/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.19/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.59 % File : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.54/0.59 % Domain : Software Verification % 0.54/0.59 % Problem : Hoare logic with procedures 114_1 % 0.54/0.59 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.59 % English : Completeness is taken relative to completeness of the underlying % 0.54/0.59 % logic. Two versions of completeness proof: nested single recursion % 0.54/0.59 % and simultaneous recursion in call rule. % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Refs : [Nip10] Nipkow (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe % 0.54/0.59 % : [BN10] Boehme & Nipkow (2010), Sledgehammer: Judgement Day % 0.54/0.59 % Source : [Nip10] % 0.54/0.59 % Names : Hoare-114_1 [Nip10] % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.59 % Rating : 0.05 v8.2.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.05 v6.3.0, 0.06 v6.2.0, 0.07 v6.1.0, 0.06 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.07 v4.1.0 % 0.54/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.54/0.59 % Number of literals : 4 ( 4 equ; 1 neg) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of variables : 4 ( 3 sgn) % 0.54/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Comments : % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 cnf(cls_tracing__def_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 c_Code__Evaluation_Otracing(V_s,V_x,T_a) = V_x ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(cls_tracing__def__raw_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 c_Code__Evaluation_Otracing(v_s,v_x,t_a) = v_x ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.60 v_s != v_t ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.60 V_s = v_ta ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % Proof found % 0.54/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.60 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:3) % 0.54/0.60 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1) % 0.54/0.60 %MaxLitNum:1 % 0.54/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.54/0.60 %SharedTerms:4 % 0.54/0.60 %goalClause: 4 5 % 0.54/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.54/0.60 [5]~E(a2,a3) % 0.54/0.60 [4]E(x41,a1) % 0.54/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.60 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.54/0.60 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.54/0.60 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 cnf(7,plain, % 0.54/0.60 (~E(a2,a1)), % 0.54/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,2,3])). % 0.54/0.60 cnf(8,plain, % 0.54/0.60 ($false), % 0.54/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7]), % 0.54/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------