%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 6 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evaln__elim__cases_I6_J_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X2),X3,X1,X4)
| X1 = c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X2,X1,X3,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evaln__elim__cases_I6_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_xa,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X2),X3,X1,X4)
| X1 = c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X2,X1,X3,X4)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_evaln__elim__cases_I6_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X2),X3,X1,X4)
| X1 = c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X2,X1,X3,X4)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_xa,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xb),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:31:38 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.99 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.37/0.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2120396 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.37/0.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.37/0.99 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2120404 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.37/0.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.37/0.99 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.99 % Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.37/0.99 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.99
% 0.37/0.99 % Proof found!
% 0.37/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.99 % Parsed axioms : 1307
% 0.37/0.99 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Initial clauses : 1307
% 0.37/0.99 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.37/0.99 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1300
% 0.37/0.99 % Processed clauses : 1834
% 0.37/0.99 % ...of these trivial : 20
% 0.37/0.99 % ...subsumed : 317
% 0.37/0.99 % ...remaining for further processing : 1497
% 0.37/0.99 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 19
% 0.37/0.99 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.37/0.99 % Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.37/0.99 % Generated clauses : 2015
% 0.37/0.99 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1541
% 0.37/0.99 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.37/0.99 % Paramodulations : 1986
% 0.37/0.99 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.37/0.99 % NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Equation resolutions : 27
% 0.37/0.99 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Total rewrite steps : 1254
% 0.37/0.99 % ...of those cached : 957
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.99 % Current number of processed clauses : 375
% 0.37/0.99 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 123
% 0.37/0.99 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.37/0.99 % Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.37/0.99 % Non-unit-clauses : 222
% 0.37/0.99 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2105
% 0.37/0.99 % ...number of literals in the above : 4735
% 0.37/0.99 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Current number of archived clauses : 1126
% 0.37/0.99 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 187453
% 0.37/0.99 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79365
% 0.37/0.99 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 211
% 0.37/0.99 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 541
% 0.37/0.99 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % BW rewrite match attempts : 191
% 0.37/0.99 % BW rewrite match successes : 96
% 0.37/0.99 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.99 % Termbank termtop insertions : 81946
% 0.37/0.99 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2625
% 0.37/0.99
% 0.37/0.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.99 % User time : 0.384 s
% 0.37/0.99 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.37/0.99 % Total time : 0.401 s
% 0.37/0.99 % Maximum resident set size: 6060 pages
% 0.37/0.99
% 0.37/0.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.99 % User time : 1.601 s
% 0.37/0.99 % System time : 0.082 s
% 0.37/0.99 % Total time : 1.684 s
% 0.37/0.99 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.37/0.99 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------