↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 26.76s 4.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   8   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn  15   !;   0   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1477,axiom,
    ! [X0] : c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) != c_Suc(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nat_Osimps_I2_J_0) ).

fof(f1478,plain,
    ! [X0] : c_Suc(X0) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1477]) ).

fof(f1518,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X0,X3)
      | X0 = c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X1,X0,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evaln__elim__cases_I6_J_0) ).

fof(f1519,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X0,X3)
      | c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X1,X0,X2,X3)) = X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1518]) ).

fof(f1544,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_xa,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_2042,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_Suc(X0) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1478]) ).

tcf(c_2070,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X0,X2,X1,X3)) = X2 )
      | ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X0),X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1519]) ).

tcf(c_2085,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_xa,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xb),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1544]) ).

tcf(c_6658,plain,
    ( ( c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(v_pn,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xa,v_xb)) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) )
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_xa,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xb) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2070]) ).

tcf(c_8657,plain,
    c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(v_pn,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_xa,v_xb)) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2042]) ).

tcf(c_8658,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_8657,c_6658,c_2085]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:12:38 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 26.76/4.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 26.76/4.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 26.76/4.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 26.76/4.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e % 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Proving...
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % 
% 26.76/4.26  % clauses                               646
% 26.76/4.26  % conjectures                           29
% 26.76/4.26  % EPR                                   85
% 26.76/4.26  % Horn                                  609
% 26.76/4.26  % unary                                 141
% 26.76/4.26  % binary                                254
% 26.76/4.26  % lits                                  1533
% 26.76/4.26  % lits eq                               350
% 26.76/4.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 26.76/4.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 26.76/4.26  % fd_cond                               15
% 26.76/4.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        44
% 26.76/4.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ 
% 26.76/4.26  % Current options:
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % ------ Proving...
% 26.76/4.26  % 
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 26.76/4.26  
% 26.76/4.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------