%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV837-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.30s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_cut_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_cut_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_tsa,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G_Ha,v_tsa,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_G_Ha,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_cut_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_tsa,t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G_Ha,v_tsa,t_a),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_tsa,t_a),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,v_G_Ha,t_a)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,v_tsa,t_a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_G_Ha,t_a),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV837-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.46 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:30:36 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 1937141 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1937144 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.30/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.30/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 574
% 0.30/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 422
% 0.30/0.63 % Initial clauses : 152
% 0.30/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 152
% 0.30/0.63 % Processed clauses : 64
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.30/0.63 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.30/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.30/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Generated clauses : 102
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 43
% 0.30/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Paramodulations : 102
% 0.30/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 68
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of those cached : 35
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 0.30/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.30/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.30/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.30/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 131
% 0.30/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 293
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.30/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.30/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.30/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.30/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.30/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.30/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9781
% 0.30/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1688
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.63 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.30/0.63 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4276 pages
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.63 % User time : 0.046 s
% 0.30/0.63 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Total time : 0.056 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.30/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------