%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV839-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,t_a),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3)),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,t_a),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,t_a),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3)),X3),
cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV839-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:23:56 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % new_bool_3 with pid 1988431 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1988434 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 454
% 0.14/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 305
% 0.14/0.48 % Initial clauses : 149
% 0.14/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 149
% 0.14/0.48 % Processed clauses : 255
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.14/0.48 % ...subsumed : 119
% 0.14/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 111
% 0.14/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.14/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.14/0.48 % Generated clauses : 781
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 500
% 0.14/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Paramodulations : 769
% 0.14/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.14/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 358
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of those cached : 179
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 106
% 0.14/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.14/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.14/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 392
% 0.14/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 698
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.14/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1087
% 0.14/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1032
% 0.14/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 77
% 0.14/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.14/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 53
% 0.14/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 0.14/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 18383
% 0.14/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1659
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.48 % User time : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.48 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4272 pages
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.48 % User time : 0.048 s
% 0.14/0.48 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.14/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------