↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWV848-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t7ZzaAtrWB true

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:02:03 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV848-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t7ZzaAtrWB true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 12:31:38 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.69  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.69  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.69  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.84  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.89  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 0.60/0.89  % done 20 iterations in 0.050s
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.89  thf(v_c_type, type, v_c: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(c_Com_Ocom_OWhile_type, type, c_Com_Ocom_OWhile: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP_type, type, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(v_b_type, type, v_b: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 0.60/0.89    (( c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP ) != ( c_Com_Ocom_OWhile @ v_b @ v_c ))).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.89    (( c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP ) = ( c_Com_Ocom_OWhile @ v_b @ v_c )),
% 0.60/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl337, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (((c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP) = (c_Com_Ocom_OWhile @ v_b @ v_c))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(cls_com_Osimps_I16_J_0, axiom,
% 0.60/0.89    (( c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP ) != ( c_Com_Ocom_OWhile @ V_fun_H @ V_com_H ))).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl312, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89         ((c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP) != (c_Com_Ocom_OWhile @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_com_Osimps_I16_J_0])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl340, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/0.89                [zip_derived_cl337, zip_derived_cl312])).
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  % Terminating...
% 0.65/0.99  % Runner terminated.
% 1.79/1.00  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------