%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV866-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:07:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 6 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_state__not__singleton__def__raw_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_state__not__singleton__def__raw_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
X1 = v_s_H,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_state__not__singleton__def__raw_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
X1 = v_s_H,
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2 ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV866-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:29:13 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1417290 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 203s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 203s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 203s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1417291 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 26
% 0.24/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.24/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.24/0.60 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.24/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.24/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 44
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 10
% 0.24/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.24/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 455
% 0.24/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 62
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.60 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.60 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.24/0.60
% 0.24/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.60 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.60 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.24/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------