↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV879-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   57 (   4 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_CollectD_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Collect(X1,X3),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CollectD_0) ).

cnf(cls_rev__image__eqI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__image__eqI_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    v_G = c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_assms_I1_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_assms_I1_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
    c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__subset_2,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X4,X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
    | c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__subset_2) ).

cnf(cls_CollectI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CollectI_0) ).

cnf(cls_empty__subsetI_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_empty__subsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_U,tc_Com_Opname)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Collect(X1,X3),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CollectD_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_rev__image__eqI_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a))),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v_G = c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_assms_I1_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Collect(X1,X3),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
    cls_Collect__def_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_G),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),X2)) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X4,X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
    | c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__subset_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CollectI_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_U,tc_Com_Opname))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,X1),v_G,t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a),v_G,tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X4,X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
    | c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
    cls_empty__subsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3)) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_U,tc_Com_Opname))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(v_G,hAPP(v_mgt__call,X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_U,tc_Com_Opname)),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),v_G,t_a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(v_G,hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV879-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:32:00 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1558092 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.64  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1558100 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.64  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.64  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.64  
% 0.19/0.64  % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 913
% 0.19/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 913
% 0.19/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.19/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 910
% 0.19/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 1674
% 0.19/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 24
% 0.19/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 310
% 0.19/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1340
% 0.19/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 43
% 0.19/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.19/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.19/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 4932
% 0.19/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3748
% 0.19/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.19/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 4882
% 0.19/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.19/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 46
% 0.19/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1875
% 0.19/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 1450
% 0.19/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 578
% 0.19/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 158
% 0.19/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 19
% 0.19/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 398
% 0.19/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3738
% 0.19/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 10118
% 0.19/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 763
% 0.19/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 94843
% 0.19/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61516
% 0.19/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 220
% 0.19/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 684
% 0.19/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 495
% 0.19/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 156
% 0.19/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 119777
% 0.19/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1732
% 0.19/0.64  
% 0.19/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.64  % User time                : 0.153 s
% 0.19/0.64  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.64  % Total time               : 0.164 s
% 0.19/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5316 pages
% 0.19/0.64  
% 0.19/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.64  % User time                : 0.621 s
% 0.19/0.64  % System time              : 0.048 s
% 0.19/0.64  % Total time               : 0.669 s
% 0.19/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.19/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------