↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV888-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.85s 6.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  11 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   7   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f48,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X0),tc_Com_Ocom),X1,X2)
      | c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X0),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evalc_OBody_0) ).

fof(f66,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X0),X1,X2)
      | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X0),tc_Com_Ocom),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

tcf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

tcf(c_1153,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1154,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Com_Obody(v_pn),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1155,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Option_Othe(iPr_def_11,tc_Com_Ocom),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1156,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(iPr_def_10,v_x,v_xa),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_1153]) ).

tcf(c_1157,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(iPr_def_12,v_x,v_xa),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_1154,c_1155]) ).

tcf(c_2287,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),X0,X1)
      | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(iPr_def_11,tc_Com_Ocom),X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1154,c_140]) ).

tcf(c_2288,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_Natural_Oevalc(iPr_def_10,X0,X1)
      | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(iPr_def_12,X0,X1) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2287,c_1153,c_1155]) ).

tcf(c_2321,plain,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(iPr_def_10,v_x,v_xa),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1157,c_2288]) ).

tcf(c_2322,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2321,c_1156]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV888-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:15:39 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.43  % Proving...
% 2.85/6.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.85/6.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.85/6.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % 
% 2.85/6.28  % clauses                               47
% 2.85/6.28  % conjectures                           2
% 2.85/6.28  % EPR                                   9
% 2.85/6.28  % Horn                                  42
% 2.85/6.28  % unary                                 15
% 2.85/6.28  % binary                                28
% 2.85/6.28  % lits                                  83
% 2.85/6.28  % lits eq                               34
% 2.85/6.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.85/6.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.85/6.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.85/6.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        8
% 2.85/6.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ 
% 2.85/6.28  % Current options:
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.85/6.28  % 
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.85/6.28  
% 2.85/6.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------